[] solecisms John 8:9 EIS KAQ EIS Randall Buth randallbuth at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 06:03:29 EDT 2008
[] “Word-Guessing” vs. Reading [] solecisms John 8:9 EIS KAQ EIS
While on the subject of solecisms, how do you all likeεἷς καθ’ εἷςEIS KAQ’ EIS ?It seems intentional enough with the correct dropping ofthe vowel in KATA, plus the correct Q θ before the wordEIS ‘one’.Proper Greek would say KAQ’ ENA καθ΄ ενα,though I can readily understand KAQ EIS as asub-standard dialect nominalization that even rhymeswith a Hebrew “ish ish”.ERRWSOIWANHS– Randall Buth, PhDwww.biblicalulpan.orgrandallbuth at gmail.comBiblical Language CenterLearn Easily – Progress Further – Remember for Life
[] “Word-Guessing” vs. Reading[] solecisms John 8:9 EIS KAQ EIS
[] solecisms John 8:9 EIS KAQ EIS Dr. Don Wilkins drdwilkins at verizon.net
Tue Aug 19 15:33:15 EDT 2008
[] solecisms John 8:9 EIS KAQ EIS [] Revelation 20:4: KAI confusion ….
Another good example of “intentional solecism” IMO, probably resulting from the influence of a foreign idiom as you point out. If the writer used KATA correctly in other constructions, we wouldn’t infer from this anomaly that he was ignorant of the proper use of KATA.Don WilkinsOn Aug 19, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Randall Buth wrote:>
While on the subject of solecisms, how do you all like>
εἷς καθ’ εἷς>
EIS KAQ’ EIS ?> >
It seems intentional enough with the correct dropping of>
the vowel in KATA, plus the correct Q θ before the word>
EIS ‘one’.> >
Proper Greek would say KAQ’ ENA καθ΄ ενα,>
though I can readily understand KAQ EIS as a>
sub-standard dialect nominalization that even rhymes>
with a Hebrew “ish ish”.> >
ERRWSO>
IWANHS> >
— >
Randall Buth, PhD>
www.biblicalulpan.org>
randallbuth at gmail.com>
Biblical Language Center>
Learn Easily – Progress Further – Remember for Life>
—>
home page: http://www.ibiblio.org/>
mailing list>
at lists.ibiblio.org>
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/
[] solecisms John 8:9 EIS KAQ EIS[] Revelation 20:4: KAI confusion ….