ProBible.net | The ProBible Project

  • One verse one day at the time
  1. Home
  2. lack

lack

Luke 16.16

Posted on August 14, 2017February 10, 2018 by ProBible
New Testament • Re: Is the lack of a verb in Luke 16.16a conspicuous?
New Testament • Re: Is the lack of a verb in Luke 16.16a conspicuous?

My rule of thumb is that if a verb is missing and it’s not in immediate parallelism with a preceding clause, try using a form of the verb εἶναι “to be.” That’s how some translations take it anyway.

Statistics: Posted by Stephen Carlson — March 12th, 2014, 1:36 am


Read more

Read more

  Posted in Luke Tagged bull, conspicuous, lack, luke, testament, verb

Recent Comments

  • Louise Cummings on John 17:5
  • RichardAnna Boyce on 1 John 2:6
  • Troy Day on 1 John 2:6
  • Louise Cummings on Hebrews 2:9
  • Louise Cummings on Acts 1:3

Recent Posts

  • Λογίζομαι with εις
  • Strange words in LXX: πιαγαριν / πισσαριν / κηριν
  • Speech from Braveheart
  • Fast food/Easter candy in Latin
  • Destination Moon

2010-2018 © ProBible™