Skip to content

Tag Archives: 1618

Mark 14:4

29-Aug-17

Stephen Hughes wrote:If John was in the thick of it, he was relating a part event that Peter wasn’t an ear-witness to.I fear that taking this position is wrapping an assumption in another assumption. If Matthew and Mark are taking a bird’s eye view, t…

Galatians 4:12

26-Aug-17

Much to study. Thanks for the help. I am also reading another article by Carl Conrad which I found after posting this thread. Of particular direct relevance, this part: “When you learn the verb γίνομαι, γενήσομαι,ἐγενόμην//ἐγενήθην, γέγονα//γεγένημαι,…

1 Corinthians 11:24

24-Aug-17

Tony Pope wrote: ↑November 29th, 2017, 5:14 amBut is there anyway a problem in the syntax of τὸ σῶμα τὸ ὑπὲρ ὑμῶν κλώμενον? If the argument is simply that such a complex phrase never occurs elsewhere in Paul and therefore it is unPauline, that is sure…

Mark 10:32

29-Jul-17

I also got the black faux leather version. I have to say that it is the nicest looking GNT I’ve seen. Even the black box it comes in is really well done. Two big thumbs up. The page layout is excellent and uncluttered. The paragraph break format…

Luke 1:45

02-Jul-17

Thanks very much for the replies, which I have just found (has something changed with notifications? – I have just ticked or re-ticked some boxes in the User Control Panel, which hopefully will sort it out).And am glad that you read the text the same …

Matthew 6:9

29-Jun-17

Shirley, it’s not a modern re-write but following the Byzantine text rather than the Alexandrian text. N-A, of course, promulgates the Alexandrian text-type. Maurice Robinson, IIRC, thinks that the Alexandrian text type may have been an ancient schola…

Matthew 16:18

28-Jun-17

Stephen Hughes wrote: ↑October 24th, 2017, 11:29 amJonathan Robie wrote: ↑October 24th, 2017, 6:01 amI don’t want this to get lost – Timothy is correct here, and this is the one direct response to the question in the OP.ταυτη is not referring back to …