The provided content is not formatted as an academic biblical exegesis. It appears to be a query from a discussion list asking for clarification on the grammatical function of prepositional phrases in John 3:15-16. As such, it cannot be transformed into an academic biblical exegesis directly. Instead, I will interpret the *query itself* as the…
An Exegetical Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Nuances in 2 Peter 3:9, 13 This exegetical study of 2 Peter 3:9, 13 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Dec 1 15:45:19 2005. The initial inquiry centered on discerning any significant semantic distinction between the terms ἐπαγγελία and ἐπάγγελμα as employed in 2 Peter 3:9…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Matthew 11:29: The Syntactic Function of the ὅτι-Clause body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, Palatino, ‘Book Antiqua’, Georgia, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em…
This exegetical study of the double article in ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου is based on a b-greek discussion. The original inquiry pondered the significance of the double definite article in the phrase ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (the Son of the Man), a self-designation frequently employed by Jesus. It highlighted its use in pivotal moments, such…
An Exegetical Analysis of Acts 2:42: The Nature of Early Christian Practices and Textual Variants This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of Acts 2:42: The Nature of Early Christian Practices and Textual Variants is based on a b-greek discussion from Monday, April 24, 2000. Initially, questions arose regarding the interpretation of Acts 2:42, specifically…
22 Ἄνδρες Ἰσραηλῖται, ἀκούσατε τοὺς λόγους τούτους. Ἰησοῦν τὸν Ναζωραῖον, ἄνδρα ⸂ἀποδεδειγμένον ἀπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ⸃ εἰς ὑμᾶς δυνάμεσι καὶ τέρασι καὶ σημείοις οἷς ἐποίησεν διʼ αὐτοῦ ὁ θεὸς ἐν μέσῳ ὑμῶν, ⸀καθὼς αὐτοὶ οἴδατε, 23 τοῦτον τῇ ὡρισμένῃ βουλῇ καὶ προγνώσει τοῦ θεοῦ ⸀ἔκδοτον διὰ ⸀χειρὸς ἀνόμων προσπήξαντες ἀνείλατε,
It looks to me like the Ἰησοῦν τὸν Ναζωραῖον in vs. 22 is the direct object of ἀνείλατε at the end of vs. 23.
Is that correct? If so, it looks like Luke is putting the emphasis on Who Died and Who Did The Killing.
Statistics: Posted by Rhoover60 — February 6th, 2017, 9:28 pm
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Philemon 1:5: The Direction of Philemon’s Faith and Love body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { font-family: Georgia, serif; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 3px solid…
An Exegetical Study of Revelation 13:15-17: Agency of the Beast and its Image This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of Revelation 13:15-17: Agency of the Beast and its Image is based on a b-greek discussion from Mon Jul 12 17:27:27 EDT 1999. The initial query presented the Greek text of Revelation 13:15-17 and…
“`html An Exegetical Inquiry into Hebrews 3:13: The Substantival Use of the Article with an Adverb body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: Georgia, serif; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; margin-top: 2em; } h3 { font-size: 1.5em; margin-top: 1.5em; } h4 {…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Galatians 1:6: Implications of ταχέως for the Chronology of the Galatian Churches body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; } h3 { font-size: 1.4em; border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.2em; margin-top: 1.5em; } p…
The articular proper name ο Ιησους appears before λεγων in most Greek witnesses (C2 E K L M N S U V W X Γ Δ Θ Π Σ Ω 047 0211 f35 399. 461. 565. 566. [1424]. 1500 2224), but is lacking in a few (ℵ B C* Zvid f1.13 33. 892) and is rejected by Bover, Greev…
The compound verb προσελθών is supported by a wide variety of Greek witnesses (ℵ B E M N Δ Θ Σ Ω 0211 f1.13 565. 892) and many editors (Bover, Greeven, Lachmann, Merk, Soden, Tischendorf [7th, 8th], Vogels), while the simple form ἐλθών appears in simil…
Some witnesses (ℵ2 B C Nvid W [Z] Θ f1.[13] 33. 892) and editors (Bover, Greeven, [Lachmann], Merk, Soden, Vogels) prefer the more standard genitive absolute construction καταβάντος δὲ αὐτοῦ, but most Greek manuscripts and Tischendorf (7th, 8th) retain…
While most witnesses end chapter 7 with just γραμματεῖς (E L M S U V X Γ Π2 Ω 047 Byz f35 565. 1424. 2224 goth), some along with the Latin and Syriac traditions have γραμματεῖς αὐτῶν καὶ οἱ Φαρισαῖοι (C2 W 0211 33 lat sy), which Lachmann prefers and wh…
The simple ἐτέλεσεν (ℵ B C W Zvid Γ Σ f1.13 33. 565. 892. 1424. 1500) is received by Bover, Lachmann, Merk, Tischendorf (7th, 8th), and Vogels, but most Greek witnesses have the compound συνετέλεσεν (E K L M S U V X Δ Θ Π Ω 047 0211 f35 Byz 2224), whic…
Influenced by the word order of the preceding μου τοὺς λόγους in 7:24, 26, the common ancestor of certain manuscripts (ℵ B W Z Θ Σ f1 892 pc) both here and in 7:24 reflects αὐτοῦ τὴν οἰκίαν, but most scribes resisted the transposition and retain the mo…
In this insignificant spelling variation some manuscripts of every text type support the spelling προσέπεσαν (ℵ B C E X Z Δ 047 f1.13 892. 1500. 2224), followed by Bover, Greeven, Merk, Soden, Tischendorf (7th, 8th), Vogels (Lachmann has προσέπαισαν), …
A small but diverse contingent of manuscripts (ℵ B C W Z Θ Σ f1 33. 892 al), along with Bover, Greeven, Lachmann, Merk, Soden, Tischendorf (7th, 8th), and Vogels, supports the word order αὐτοῦ τὴν οἰκίαν instead of the more common τὴν οἰκίαν αὐτοῦ, as …
The reading ὁμοιωθήσεται is contained in some witnesses (ℵ B Z Θ Φ 0281 f1.13 33. 892 al ff1 l vg sy-p sa mae; Or Did) and preferred by Bover, Greeven, Lachmann, Merk, Soden, Tischendorf (8th), and Vogels, but ὁμοιώσω αὐτόν is well represented (C E G K…
A few manuscripts (ℵ B* C L W Z f13 33 pc), followed by Bover, Greeven, Lachmann, Merk, Soden, Tischendorf (7th, 8th), and Vogels, have επροφητευσαμεν with the augment before the preposition of the compound verb rather than after it, while all the rest…
