2 Peter 2:2 relative pronoun – which antecedent? Timothy Duke tduke at accsoft.com.au Wed May 26 08:24:08 EDT 1999 ICHQUS 2 Peter 2:2 relative pronoun – which antecedent? After a long time without a computer, I return to !2 Peter 2:2 reads:KAI POLLOI …AUTWN..DI’ hOUS…My question is this: which is the antecedent: POLLOI or…
EXERA(S)MA 2Peter 2:22 Thomas J. Kraus tj.kraus at gmx.de Wed Jan 2 14:15:43 EST 2002 Septuagint Septuagint Dear colleagues,there is a minor textcritical issue related to 2Peter 2:22 where most andthe best of the witnesses read TO IDION EXERAMAHowever, there is quite a number of minuscules together with Codex Bezae whoattestTON IDION EXERASMA[A third…
I’m struggling with the grammar of II Peter 1:2,3. To which noun, God or Jesus Christ, do the pronouns in verse 3 relate to? Normally it would be the nearest antecedent. What other issues must be considered? 2 cavri” uJmi’n kaiV eijrhvnh plhqunqeivh ejn ejpignwvsei tou’ qeou’ kaiV jIhsou’ tou’ kurivou hJmw’n. 3 JW” pavnta…
2 Peter 3:12 – PROSDOKWNTAS KAI SPEUDONTAS THN PAROUSIAN THS TOU QEOU hHMERASIs it possible to take the participles as a sort of hendiadys and PAROUSIAN as an accusative of respect and understand the sense to the effect of “with eager anticipation working diligently as regards the coming of the day of God” or such?…
[] EPAGGELIA/EPAGGELMA 2 Peter 3:9, 13 Lorinda Hoover and Jim Mossman hoovmoss at iowatelecom.net Thu Dec 1 15:45:19 EST 2005 [] Hebrews 13:4 [] anarthrous KURIOS in 2 Peter 3 2 Peter 3:9aOU BRADUNEI KURIOS TNS EPAGGELIAS…2 Peter 3:13aKAINOUS DE OURANOUS KAI GHN KAINHN KATA TO EPAGGELMA AUTOU PROSDOKWMEN,…I am wondering if there is…
