[] Romans 11.26: ASEBEIAS dstorm at sorenkierkegaard.org dstorm at sorenkierkegaard.org Sat May 22 14:07:38 EDT 2004 [] New Koine Greek Study Group [] Romans 11.26: ASEBEIAS Romans 11.26 says, APOSTREYEI ASEBEIAS APO IAKWB.I have checked all NT references to APOSTREFW, and see that it takes an accusative d.o. Am I correct in understanding ASEBEIAS…
[] Romans 1:26 αἵ τε γὰρ θήλειαι αὐτῶν (hAI TE GAR QHLEIAI AUTWN) Jonathan Robie jwrobie at mindspring.com Wed Dec 3 16:39:17 EST 2008 [] Jude 2 – Again [] Romans 1:26 αἵ τε γὰρ θήλειαι αὐτῶν (hAI TE GAR QHLEIAI AUTWN) I’m trying to follow the exact shade of meaning of τε γὰρ…
Objective Genitive in Rom. 3:22 Jim Ellis jellis at dallas.net Sun Oct 3 14:16:07 EDT 1999 1 Cor 6:18 Matt 19:9 Hi Folks,I am new to the List. Pardon me if this question seems trivial to you.It seems almost redundant for Paul to say “even the righteousness of Godthrough faith in Jesus Christ for all…
Rom 3:24 EN CRISTWi IHSOU richard smith rbsads at aol.com Sun May 26 23:21:16 EDT 2002 Definitions on Verbal Aspect Rom 3:24 EN CRISTWi IHSOU Rom 3:24 DIKAIOUMENOI DWREAN THi AUTOU CARITI DIA THS APOLUTRWSEWS THS ENCRISTWi IHSOU.This use of EN CRISTWi seemed interesting to me. I am somewhat aware thatPaul uses the phrase…
hOTI in Rom 5.8 Steven Lo Vullo themelios at earthlink.net Sun Oct 14 17:25:32 EDT 2001 Jn.3:15,16 GAR in Rom 5.7 Hi all:In Rom 5.8 the Gramcord text of Accordance tags hOTI as a subordinatingcausal conjunction. But it seems more appropriate to take it as a nominalconjunction introducing a clause in apposition to AGAPHN.…
IOUDAIOUS TE KAI hELLHNAS (Rom 3:9) Moon-Ryul Jung moon at sogang.ac.kr Sun Oct 7 06:53:10 EDT 2001 Suggestion for a New NT Course Eph 4:9 TA KATWTERA About X TE KAI Y, I read the following in the book THE GREEK PARTICLES vy J.D. Denniston:TE … KAI, “just as much as”, “not only ..…
[] Romans 9:22-24 EI DE.. KAI HINA…? craig newsgroupstuff at swiftdsl.com.au Wed Dec 29 13:18:57 EST 2004 [] 2 Thess 2 APOKALUPTW? [] Romans 9:22-24 EI DE.. KAI HINA…? Romans 9:22-24 begins with ‘EI DE…’How does this work grammatically? It seems to me that when one begins withan ‘if’ (EI), some kind of ‘then..’…
hOSOI in Rom 6.3 Steven Lo Vullo doulos at merr.com Sat Jan 19 22:59:41 EST 2002 AUTOS/AUTOU hOSOI in Rom 6.3 Hi all:Rom 6.3: hOSOI EBAPTISQHMEN EIS CRISTON IHSOUN, EIS TON QANATON AUTOU EBAPTISQHMEN;This is probably a simple question, but for some reason I can’t get a grip on it. Does the correlative pronoun…
GAR in Rom 5.7 Steven Lo Vullo themelios at earthlink.net Sun Oct 14 17:54:31 EDT 2001 hOTI in Rom 5.8 REMA THEOU Hi again:Rom 5.7 contains two occurrences of GAR. Both are tagged as explanatoryconjunctions in Accordance. Does the second instance simply introduce aclause parallel to the first clause introduced by GAR, or is…
Roman 1:17 Chong-Hush Lo clo at telcordia.com Wed Jul 24 17:32:18 EDT 2002 Pronunciation Variation UK/US? Gal 6:2 and 6:5 – bearing burdens Roman 1:17ek pistews eis pistin kaqws gegraptai o de dikaios ek pistews zhsetai.ek pistews eis pistin is “From faith to faith” (KJV) or “ByFaith to faith”dikaios ek pistews zhsetai. Means The…
[] Question about translation of Romans 13:8 Sharon VanDevender shavandev at hotmail.com Fri Apr 20 21:23:31 EDT 2007 The other translation problem in Romans 13 is the word “authority” (exousia). …. reason is that doing good in this context means fulfilling the law (Rom 13:8-10). Romans 13:8-14 Be under obligation to no one – the…
[] Rom. 13:10a A. J. Birch a_j_birch at yahoo.es Wed May 30 02:18:44 EDT 2007 [] A Sourcebook of Greek Texts for the Gospels [] Rom. 13:10a Rom. 13:10a: “hH AGAPH TWi PLHSION KAKON OUK ERGAZETAI.”Why “PLHSION”? I would have expected “PLHSIWi”. Is this a substantive use of the preposition, as opposed to the…
Rom 11:25 George Athas gathas at ausisp.com Tue Oct 23 09:20:17 EDT 2001 Hebrews 10:14 “Retained accusative”? (was: RE: instances of (accusative)objects in passive constructions) The latter portion of Rom 11:25 reads:hOTI PWRWSIS APO MEROUS TWi ISRAHL GEGONEN ACRIS hOU TO PLHRWMA TWN EQNWN EISELQHi.How ought this be translated? I’d like to focus particular…
[] Rom 14:21 aorist infinitives Scott Wells s.a.wells at insightbb.com Tue Jun 12 21:45:43 EDT 2007 [] Funk [] Rom 14:21 aorist infinitives KALON TO MH FAGEIN KREA MHDE PIEIN OINON MHDE EN hWi hO ADELFOS SOUPROSKOPTEI.BDF 338(1) [note] remarks regarding this verse “Also in Rom 14:21.the aoristis to be taken strictly: ‘it is…
Rom 12 19 Brian Sullivan navillusbpi at primus.com.au Sat May 6 09:06:48 EDT 2000 Previous message: Rev. 14:10 Next message: 1 John Greetings to all,Please pardon what is probably a basic question.Rom 12 19 Paul advisors believers not to avenege themselves, but ‘alla dote topon th orgh.’I read that as ‘to give (or yield)…
[] Gen 25.23 and the LXX, in Rom 9.12 Carl Conrad cwconrad2 at mac.com Wed Sep 15 05:46:45 EDT 2010 [] Gen 25.23 and the LXX, in Rom 9.12 [] Gen 25.23 and the LXX, in Rom 9.12 On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:55 PM, P R wrote:> I am looking through the NT…
hWS EX ERGWN in Rom 9.32a Steven Lo Vullo slovullo at mac.com Thu Apr 18 21:18:05 EDT 2002 Greek computer programs (plus learning strategy for first-year Greek) Greek fonts with papyrological symbols Hi all:Rom 9.32a: DIA TI? hOTI OUK EK PISTEWS ALL’ hWS EX ERGWNMy question concerns the use of hWS here. Accordance tags…
hOION … hOTI in Rom 9.6 Steven Lo Vullo slovullo at mac.com Fri Apr 12 01:12:07 EDT 2002 e-Greek & information discounts e-Greek & information discounts Greetings all:Rom 9.6 OUC hOION DE hOTI EKPEPTWKEN hO LOGOS TOU QEOU.According to BGAD and B-D-F, OUC hOION … hOTI is a mixture of OUC hOIONand OUC hOTI.…
Romans 3:23 – USTEROUNTAI Jeff Young youngman at triad.rr.com Tue May 14 11:27:01 EDT 2002 1` Corinthians Commentary 1` Corinthians Commentary Hello all. A question regarding Romans 3:23.PANTES GAR HMARTON KAI USTEROUNTAI THS DOXHS TOU QEOU(“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”)Excuse me if this is an “interpretive” question…
Romans 5:15 Alan Wong awong at ma.ultranet.com Mon Sep 6 21:13:19 EDT 1999 Rev 11:15 hH BASILEIA / hAI BASILEIAI Romans 5:15 Here is a question from a little-Greeker,How do you construe the syntax in the apodosis of Romans 5:15? ..POLLOWi MALLON hH CARIS TOU QEOU KAI hH DWREA EN CARITI THi TOUhENOS ANQRWPOU…
