1 Corinthians 15:25

Tense Of Infinitive In 1 Cor 15 25

“`html An Exegetical Examination of the Infinitive Tense in 1 Corinthians 15:25 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } p { margin-bottom: 1em; } ul { margin-left: 2em; list-style-type: disc; } ol { margin-left: 2em; } b { font-weight: bold; } i {…

1 Timothy 6:12

New Testament • Re: Change of tense – what effect does it have:  1Tim 6,12
Barry Hofstetter wrote:

Peter Streitenberger wrote:Dear friends,

Ἀγωνίζου τὸν καλὸν ἀγῶνα τῆς πίστεως, ἐπιλαβοῦ τῆς αἰωνίου ζωῆς, (1Tim 6,12) – why is the first imperative in the present tense and the second in the Aorist? Is it a call to an ongoing fight of faith and a grasping of eternal live seen as a singe event (if so is it already done or a future event – I mean the grasping).
Thanks !
Peter

I would see the force of ἐπιλαβοῦ as “grasp,” “seize firmly.” In my mind the aorist imperative simply looks at the action as a whole, and I wonder if this isn’t really an aktionsart issue?

When I was a kid many, many moons ago (later 1940’s), a popular ditty was “You’ve got to accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative, latch on to the affirmative, don’t mess with Mr. Inbetween.” “Latch on to” seems to me perfect colloquial English idiom for ἐπιλαβέσθαι — “get a firm grip on.”

Statistics: Posted by cwconrad — May 22nd, 2014, 2:42 pm


Acts 13:48

Acts 13:48

An Exegetical Study of Acts 13:48: The Grammatical Function and Semantic Nuance of τεταγμενοι This exegetical study of “Tense of τεταγμενοι in Acts 13:48″ is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Jul 1 00:47:32 EDT 1999. The initial inquiry sought clarification on the use of verb tense in dependent clauses, specifically regarding the phrase…