Ephesians 4:26

Ephesians 4:26 Louise Cafolla lcafolla at hotmail.com Wed Apr 12 22:07:04 EDT 2000   Previous message: Greek diagraming Next message: Ephesians 4:26 Friends discussing Ephesians have a question concerning the tense of the verb “angry” in this passage. Some references seem to indicate the text is a continual command, i.e., “continually be angry.” Roberts Word…

Ephesians 3:6

Togetherness in Eph 3:6 c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Mon Oct 29 17:05:08 EST 2001   Towards a semantic definition of Greek Middle Theological Dictionary of the New Testament Before I started looking over Ephesians today, I was reading a book onRhetorical Analysis* and for that reason I was perhaps looking for patternsof interest…

Ephesians 4:18

ONTES Eph 4:18 – which participle? c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Wed Oct 3 15:17:32 EDT 2001   Eph 4:19 Vice List What To Do With PNEUMATIKOS A disagreement exists about which participle ONTES should be joined with inEph 4:18. ESKOTWMENOI – H.A.W. Meyer, E. Best, H. Alford, P.T. Obrien, UBSGNT3APHLLOTRIWMENOI – Eadie, and…

Ephesians 4:22

Eph 4: 22-24 Dale M. Wheeler dalemw at teleport.com Wed Apr 5 17:49:12 EDT 2000   Previous message: Mk. 12:34b Next message: Thinking Like a Scribe Mk 6:46 Harold R. Holmyard III wrote:Dear Dale, You bring out an >important emphasis in stressing the relevance of Eph 2:15 to Eph 4:22-24. I >recently studied Colossians with…

Ephesians 4:9

Eph 4:19 Vice List c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Wed Oct 3 13:48:30 EDT 2001   results of May 1 want ad for volunteers ONTES Eph 4:18 – which participle? Eph 4:19 hOITINES APHLGHKOTES hAUTOUS PAREDWKAN THi ASELEGIAiEIS ERGASIAN AKAQARSIAS PAHS EN PLEONEXIAi.There is a temptation to find a semantic link here between ERGASIAN…

James 5:13

James 5:13

Subject: James 5:13-19 Mark Markham markhamm at topsurf.com Mon Jan 3 09:19:20 EST 2000 John 1:2 ‘The same’ or ‘He’ Ign. Eph. 15:3 Subject: James 5:13-19Dear all,I am having a mixed reaction concerning the use of several words and the context of this passage. Please put aside the theological implications here without much bias help…