Ephesians 2.6

Ephesians 2.6, SUNEK’AQISEN >EN TO’IS … etc.

inflection of the first aorist, 3 p singular, SUNEKAQISEN, whence the final nu?

Inflections in Smyth, #383, p. 115, ELUSA, ELUSAS, ELUSE, with no final nu; but methinks I’ve seen that final nu often, don’t know where.

Is there a rule?

It’s a handy nu, with a vowel following; is that the reason? Any citations to a grammar (Smyth, Goodwin and Gulick, Wallace)?

Thanks much / Andrew Porter, app@jedp.com

People who read this article also liked:


One thought on “Ephesians 2.6

  1. Stephen Carlson says:

    It’s the so-called “movable nu,” generally to avoid hiatus with a following, and quite common in Koine. See Smyth § 134; BDF § 20.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>