Apparently the Greek Orthodox Church has also done a bit of re-writing : "ὡς καὶ ἡμεῖς ἀφίεμεν τοῖς ὀφειλέταις ἡμῶν" (eg. at http://www.orthodoxprayer.org/Lords_Prayer.html (though the rest of the text follows Matthew rather than Luke) Maybe they think it's best to say we're working on forgiving them, rather than that we've actually done so ? Shirley Rollinson Statistics: Posted by Shirley Rollinson — December 15th, 2017, 5:54 pm
Thanks for posting this. Those of us who've been around for a while recall Jeffrey B. Gibson doing a long series of research projects regarding historical and philological aspects of the Lord's Prayer. I particularly recall a long thread on πειρασμός. Not sure how we can discuss this without diving headlong into biblical theology.Stephen Carlson wrote: ↑December 12th, 2017, 4:59 pmLaudator Temporis Acti has a big quotation from Jeffrey B. Gibson on Ancient Unease with Lead Us Not Into Temptation.
I ran a search on this in TLG: εἰσενεχθῆναι εἰς πειρασμόν. That led me to the discussion on evangelicaltextualcriticism. Statistics: Posted by Stirling Bartholomew — December 12th, 2017, 5:21 pmCf. Marcion's version of the Lord's prayer as reconstructed by Adolf von Harnack (Marcion. Das Evangelium vom fremden Gott. 2nd edition 1924, 207*): μὴ ἄφες ἡμᾶς εἰσενεχθῆναι εἰς πειρασμόν. Harnack based his reconstruction on Tertullian adv. Marc. 4.26.5: quis non sinet nos deduci in temptationem? In Tertullian this is part of a highly rhetorical argument with a series of rhetorical questions. So we should not take his wording as representing Marcion's. Ulrich Schmid12/08/2017 9:04 pm http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blog ... is-on.html