[bible passage=”Romans 14:14″] In the NT, the adjective KOINOS occurs twelve times. In the A.V., it is translated as follows: “common” 7 times “unclean” 3 times “defiled” 1 time “unholy” 1 time Three times it is translated as “unclean” and only in Romans 14:14. In the Latin Vulgate of Romans 14:14, KOINON is translated by…
Iver Larsen » September 7th, 2013, 12:29 am In another forum we have been discussing the awkward grammar of Acts 10:36 and its likely Aramaic background. I have a couple of questions about the text from verses 34-36:34 Ἀνοίξας δὲ Πέτρος τὸ στόμα εἶπεν, Ἐπ᾽ ἀληθείας καταλαμβάνομαι ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν προσωπολήμπτης ὁ θεός, 35 ἀλλ᾽ ἐν…
προπεμπόντων ἡμᾶς πάντων σὺν γυναιξὶν καὶ τέκνοις ἕω PROPEMTONTWN hHMAS TANTWN SUN GUNAIXIn KAI TEKNOIS –Acts 21:5 I recently noticed a switch in translating SUN in Acts 21:35 from “and” to “including.” Since these are mutually exclusive meanings in English, I checked Perseus to see if Greek was any different. Sure enough: 8. including, “–”…
KAI THN DOXAN THN PARA TOU MONOU QEOU OU ZHTEITE –John 5:44 ” . . . and seek not the honour that comes from God alone?” “A Grammar of New Testament Greek,” by James Hope Moulton, Vol. III-Syntax, by Nigel Turner, pg. 225-226: “There is therefore not surprisingly some confusion of monos with the adv.…
[] re. I Cor 15,22 Steven Lo Vullo slovullo at mac.com Sun Jul 11 19:11:36 EDT 2004 [] Hebrews 1:2 [] re. I Cor 15,22 — CORRECTION George, all apologies to you for taking so long to get back to you.On Jun 16, 2004, at 10:11 AM, George F. Somsel wrote:> I don’t attach…
Dear all, Can I ask if there is any way to tell what an adverb modifies? It seems to me that it can modify one or more of: a complete clause, a verb clause, another adverb (including adjectival or prepositional or dative clause), and even a noun clause. If so, how do I differentiate between…
Ephesians 3.1 Al Lukaszewski alski at fuller.edu Tue May 4 00:25:00 EDT 1999 FWIW: Relatively easy classical Greek texts Help with PhD Dissertation Pre-topic Dear Listmembers:I would be interested in hearing what everyone thinks of the syntax, inEphesians 3.1, of TOUTOU XARIN and whether the sentence should beunderstood as with an understood EIMI or…
Dear Friends, I’m reading a passage from Arethas (Fragm. in Epist. II ad Thess, 661.15): “SUNUPAKOUETAI TAUTA TOIS PROKEIMENOIS· MHDEIS hUMAS EXAPA THSHi hOTI ENESTHKEN hH hHMERA PRIN TAUTA GENHTAI TOTE THN APISTIAN TWN ANQRWPWN hO DIABOLOS EISHGEN” I wanted to compare it with 2Thes 2,2: “hWS hOTI ENESTHKEN hH hHMERA TOU CRISTOU” Is ENESTHKEN…
The relevant paragraph is quoted here; Phi 3:12-16 12 OUC OTI HDH ELABON H HDH TETELEIWMAI DIWKW DE EI KAI KATALABW, EF hW KAI KATELHMFQHN hUPO CRISTOU 13 ADELFOI, EGW EMAUTON OUPW LOGIZOMAI KATEILHFENAI hEN DE TA MEN OPISW EPILANQANOMENOS TOIS DE EMPROSQEN EPEKTEINOMENOS 14 KATA SKOPON DIWKW EIS TO BRABEION THS ANW KLHSEWS TOU…
This is rather a quick question on a first read of Mark 1:1: Should the genitive “of Jesus Christ” be translated as a possessive belonging to the “Gospel” in the first clause? Also, isn’t the clumsiness of the phrase, rather hanging at the end sufficient proof for its later addition in B D W /al/…
“TAUTHN DE QUGATERA ABRAAM OUSAN, HN EDHSEN O SATANAS IDOU DEKA KAI OKTW ETH, OUK EDEI LUQHNAI APO TOU DESMOU TOUTOU THi HMERAi TOU SABBATOU;” (Luke 13:16). I’ve just read this chapter and it struck me that the place in the sentence and the use of the word “IDOU” were somewhat different from the normal…
[] Mt 6:15 AFHTE vs. AFIETE Oun Kwon kwonbbl at gmail.com Wed Mar 23 23:35:41 EDT 2011 [] Bloody Sweat [] Mt 6:15 AFHTE vs. AFIETE Mt 6:15 EAN DE MH AFHTE TOIS ANQRWPOIS TA PARAPTWMATA AUTWN, OUDE hO PATHRhUMWN AFHSEI TA PARAPTWMATA hUMWN.ἐὰν δὲ μὴ ἀφῆτε τοῖς ἀνθρώποις τὰ παραπτώματα αὐτῶν, οὐδὲ ὁπατὴρ…
[bible passage=”Matthew 8:23″]
[bible passage=”Galatians 4:8″]
[bible passage=”1John 2:15″]
[bible passage=”John 1:28″]
[bible passage=”Matthew 12:1″]
The long ending of Mark Larry Overton LGO at larryoverton.com Fri Jun 15 23:01:31 EDT 2001 Which Greek NT should we use? The long ending of Mark Dear ~I have a question that I know is not appropriate for discussion on ,but I don’t know where else to turn. I’m hoping for some off-listdirection. I…
John 9:6 TAUTA EIPWN EPTUSEN CAMAI KAI EPOIHSEN PHLON EK TOU PTUSMATOS KAI EPECRISEN AUTOU TON PHLON EPI TOUS OFQALMOUS AUTOU is strange here. Is it possible that we have here a “dative-genitive”, a genitive with dative meaning, like in Modern Greek? D/05 has the dative here, actually. Or does it refer to PTUSMATOS: “the…
Is APOGRAFASQAI correct here? I would have expected APOGRAFESQAI. Vasile Stancu
