Revelation 17:7

The Use Of The Greek Participle In Rev 17 7

[] The Use of the Greek Participle in Rev 17:7 John Calvin Hall johncalvinhall at gmail.com Wed Jul 21 04:12:16 EDT 2010   [] Spiritual psalms, hymns and songs?–Ephesians 5:19;Colossians 3:16 [] The Use of the Greek Participle in Rev 17:7 …καὶ τοῦ θηρίου τοῦ βαστάζοντος αὐτήν….KAI TOU QHRIOU TOU BASTAZONTOS AUTHN… and the beast…

Revelation 4:11

Rev 4.11 (breaking Of Sharp’s Rule)

Rev 4.11 (breaking of Sharp’s Rule) Jason A. Hare language_lover64801 at yahoo.com Thu Jun 21 02:56:33 EDT 2001   Book questions Rev 4.9 (Double Accentuation) Revelation 4.11AXIOS EI, hO KURIOS KAI hO QEOS hHMWN,LABEIN THN DOXAN KAI THN TIMHN KAI THN DUNAMIN,hOTI SU EKTISAS TA PANTAKAI DIA TO QELHMA SOU HSAN KAI EKTISQHSAN.I’m just curious…

Revelation 19:21

Rev. 19 12  Names Written On What  (was Rev 19 21)

[] Rev. 19:12–names written on what? (was Rev 19:21) Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu Sun Nov 26 08:22:52 EST 2006   [] Rev. 19:21–names written on what?? [] Rev. 19:21–names written on what?? There’s been a little water under the bridge, but I have been pondering this matter a bit.On Nov 24, 2006, at…

Revelation 8:9

Rev. 8 9  What Died

[] Rev. 8:9–what died? George F Somsel gfsomsel at yahoo.com Mon Nov 13 15:32:52 EST 2006   [] Rev. 8:9–what died? [] EILHFEN, Rev. 8:5 — “aoristic”? Since it’s sea-life, I would say that something smells rather fishy. georgegfsomsel_________—– Original Message —-From: Webb <webb at selftest.net>To: at lists.ibiblio.orgSent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:22:18 PMSubject: []…

Revelation 17:6

QAUMASATE QAUMASIA Hab 1 5  Rev. 17 6

QAUMASATE QAUMASIA Hab 1:5 /Rev. 17:6 c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Wed Jul 10 16:50:29 EDT 2002   A greek defintion of ERCOMAI QAUMASATE QAUMASIA Hab 1:5 /Rev. 17:6 HAB. 1:5 IDETE hOI KATAFRONHTAI KAI EPIBLEYATE KAI QAUMASATE QAUMASIA KAIAFANISQHTE DIOTI ERGON EGW ERGAZOMAI EN TAIS hHMERAIS hUMWN hO OU MHPISTEUSHTE EAN TIS EKDIHGHTAIREV.…

Revelation 22:11

Rev. 22 11 And 3rd Person Imperatives

Rev. 22:11 and 3rd person imperatives boyd at huxcomm.net boyd at huxcomm.net Thu Oct 18 18:57:21 EDT 2001   What Do We Make of CWRIS and ANDRES? Greek Courses Online I’ve had a lingering question about 3rd person imperatives, which was further kindled by Revelation 22:11. Here’s the text:hO ADIKWN ADIKHSATW ETI KAI hO hRUPAROS…

Revelation 1:10

Rev. 1 10

[] Rev.1:10 Lira rosangelalira at terra.com.br Mon Dec 1 07:57:15 EST 2003   [] N.T. Textual Criticism [] Rev. 1:8 ERCOMENOS What I’ve found about this was that although the prevailing interpretationequates the expression “Lord’s day” with Sunday, this equation is based noton internal evidences of the book of Revelation but on three second-centurypatristic testimonies,…

Revelation 20:4

Revelation 20:4

erasmus and rev. Kevin W. Woodruff cierpke at prodigy.net Sun Sep 5 20:56:28 EDT 1999   3 questions erasmus and rev. Jim and others:I was always under the impression that Erasmus had in his work _Annotationson the New Testament_ (Novum Testamentum Annotationes) confessed (forgive meif my Latin is faulty):…quanquam in calce hujus libri, nonulla verba…

Revelation 8:6

New Testament • Re: rough breathing on αὐτοὺς Rev. 8:6 ?

I concur that Schmid is a good resource on the text of Revelation. I also found that Hoskier was a great resource when working with this text.

Hoskier, Herman Charles. Concerning the text of the Apocalypse: collations of all existing available Greek documents with the standard text of Stephen’s third edition, together with the testimony of versions, commentaries and fathers; a complete conspectus of all authorities Vol. 1. 2 vols., 1929.

Regarding the Byzantine text tradition, at least some of the variation here can be attributed to the fact that Revelation does not appear at all in the lectionary tradition of the Church. We find much greater consistency in the texts that are regularly used in the liturgical services.

Statistics: Posted by spuluka — February 28th, 2014, 10:51 pm


Revelation 2:10

New Testament • Re: Rev 2:10
Stephen Carlson wrote:
Per BDAG μηδείς 2bβ (p. 647), μηδέν = in no way

Ah I see. That makes perfect sense, though I don’t have BDAG. ;)

Stephen Hughes wrote:

Stephen Carlson wrote:Per BDAG μηδείς 2bβ (p. 647), μηδέν = in no way

It seems weaker than examples like:

Luke 4:35 wrote:
Καὶ ἐπετίμησεν αὐτῷ ὁ Ἰησοῦς, λέγων, Φιμώθητι, καὶ ἔξελθε ἐξ αὐτοῦ. Καὶ ῥίψαν αὐτὸν τὸ δαιμόνιον εἰς μέσον ἐξῆλθεν ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ, μηδὲν βλάψαν αὐτόν.

Acts 16:28 wrote:
Ἐφώνησεν δὲ φωνῇ μεγάλῃ ὁ Παῦλος λέγων, Μηδὲν πράξῃς σεαυτῷ κακόν· ἅπαντες γάρ ἐσμεν ἐνθάδε.

Thanks for the examples!

Stephen Hughes wrote:
Compare this instance, though, where οὐ is used different to οὐδέν

Mark 14:60 wrote:Καὶ ἀναστὰς ὁ ἀρχιερεὺς εἰς μέσον ἐπηρώτησεν τὸν Ἰησοῦν, λέγων, Οὐκ ἀποκρίνῃ οὐδέν; Τί οὗτοί σου καταμαρτυροῦσιν;

Isn’t this just the double negative, where “ουκ αποκρινη ουδεν” just means “do you not answer anything?”

Statistics: Posted by David Lim — June 25th, 2014, 6:26 am