I’m translating Rev 21:5 and the word καθήμενος is giving me some trouble. The parsing code for this word is pt.pm.nsm (participle.present middle.nominative singular masculine). I would form this word as follows: καθη + ο + μενο + ς So my question is: why doesn’t the η + ο contract to ω? thank-you for your…
This is my first post to this list. I am translating the NT directly from the Greek source to an indigenous language of Latin America (more at http://nebibliaj.org). My concern is to produce a literary translation that is as objectively accurate as possible from all viewpoints. My interest is philological; I am not working with…
[] Revelation 20:5b David Koot davidk73002 at yahoo.com Mon Nov 15 02:11:46 EST 2010 [] EKTENESTERON in Luke 22:44 [] Revelation 20:5b Revelation 20:5b, hAUTH hH ANASTASIS hH PROTH. How does this relate grammatically to v. 4 and 5a? What is the subject? What is the main verb?David Koot, AdministratorThe Upper Room Christian Center…
I’ll be going over Rev 21:1-7 in my Greek class on Thursday, and I’ve found a syntactically confusing passage I’d appreciate your thoughts on. The sentence is the fifth clause of Rev 21:3, which reads as follows: καὶ αὐτὸς ὁ θεὸς μετ᾽ αὐτῶν ἔσται [αὐτῶν θεός], KAI AUTOS hO QEOS MET’ AUTWN ESTAI [AUTWN QEOS].…
Does anyone have any thoughts about the use of the double article in hO hUIOS TOU ANQRWPOU which Jesus used of himself many times? He even asked the newly healed man who had been born blind, if he knew who “The son of the man is”. Stephen used it too when he saw Jesus at…
Revelation 13.15-17 Christian Naaktgeboren naak at rle.nupes.cefetpr.br Mon Jul 12 17:27:27 EDT 1999 EN XRISTWi IHSOU-Phil. 4:7 EN XRISTWi IHSOU-Phil. 4:7 CARIS UMIN KAI EIRHNH APO QEOU Revelation 13.15-17 is: 13.15 KAI EDOQH AUTW DOUNAI PNEUMA TH EIKONI TOU QHRIOU INA KAILALHSH H EIKWN TOU QHRIOU KAI POIHSH [INA] OSOI EAN MH PROSKUNHSWSIN THEIKONI TOU…
