Rev. 3:15 Iver Larsen iver_larsen at sil.org Mon Apr 1 03:34:01 EST 2002 Rev. 3:3a Eta + Upsilon diphthong > OIDA SOU TA ERGA hOTI OUTE YUCROS EI OUTE ZESTOS> OFELON YUCROS HS H ZESTOS…> > Because both ZESTOS and YUCROS were desirable states, I wonder> if we can understand both in a positive…
[] Rev 3:16 EMEW Jarek Romanowski romanjaro at poczta.onet.pl Tue Jul 29 10:38:34 EDT 2008 [] differences [] Rev 3:16 EMEW Hello,In Rev 3:16 we have word: EMESAI from: EMEW. The standard tranlsation from BDAG/BGDA, LSJ, (in TWNT is absent) is: to vomit, throw up. In one of polish literal translation I have met…
John 3:2 – DIDASKALOS: what kind of nominative? Paul Felix paulwfelix at iolusa.com Wed May 19 15:39:11 EDT 1999 Machen’s Greek NT Answer Key. Syntax Mark 8:4 What type of nominative is used for DIDASKALOS in APO QEOU ELHLUQAS DIDASKALOS in John 3:2?Paul Felix————– next part ————–An HTML attachment was scrubbed…URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail//attachments/19990519/92c6b947/attachment.html Machen’s…
1 Peter 3:7 John Barach jbarach at telusplanet.net Wed Sep 8 19:49:10 EDT 1999 1 Cor 14:34 — LALEIN Wallace’s Grammar available in electronic book format Fellow ers:Could any of you help me understand the syntax of 1 Peter 3:7? Thepassage reads:hOI ANDRES hOMOIWS SUNOIKOUNTES KATA GNWSIN hWS ASQENESTERWi SKEUEI TWiGUNAIKEIWi APONEMONTES TIMHN hWS…
Mark 3:16-19: what a strange construction! Moon-Ryul Jung moon at sogang.ac.kr Wed Jan 8 06:56:00 EST 2003 Sorry for Repeat Mark 3:16-19: what a strange construction! Hi all, I am reading Mark. This time it goes well. I hope to finish it this timeMark 3:16 – 19:[KAI EPOIHSEN TOUS DWDEKA](1) KAI EPEQHKEN ONOMA TWi SIMONI…
Question on John 17:3 Robert W Meyers bwmeyers at juno.com Mon Dec 27 11:44:41 EST 1999 Pronouns in John 1:1 and 1 John 1:1-4 Question on John 17:3 Would someone tell me whether the Granville Sharp rulehas any applicability here?”The only True God” KAI “Jesus Christ Whom You sent?”Is the ON preceding APESTEILAS regarded…
[] James 1:3 John Colby colby at solutions2000.net Mon Dec 29 18:18:00 EST 2003 [] Where can I get ancient Greek documents online? [] James 1:3 James 1:3 reads:GINWSKONTES hOTI TO DOKIMION hUMWN THS PISTEWS KATEPGAZETAI hUPOMONHNThis might be obvious, but what does hUMWN modify? I think it is quite obvious that it modifies THS…
[] Acts 2:17 dream: deponens or passive? Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu Tue Apr 27 17:11:28 EDT 2004 [] Very interesting GNT, _A Readers Greek New Testament_ [] Acts 2:17 dream: deponens or passive? Forwarded for: “Hessel + Coby Visser” <hessel.visser at sil.org>To: “Carl W. Conrad” <cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu>Subject: Acts 2:17 dream: deponens…
Subject: James 5:13-19 Mark Markham markhamm at topsurf.com Mon Jan 3 09:19:20 EST 2000 John 1:2 ‘The same’ or ‘He’ Ign. Eph. 15:3 Subject: James 5:13-19Dear all,I am having a mixed reaction concerning the use of several words and the context of this passage. Please put aside the theological implications here without much bias help…
[] Fwd: Ephesians 2:1-3 John Butzu jbutzu at gmail.com Tue Mar 24 10:48:13 EDT 2009 [] Zhubert’s daily greek read [] Fwd: Ephesians 2:1-3 ———- Forwarded message ———-From: John Butzu <jbutzu at gmail.com>Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:01 AMSubject: Ephesians 2:1-3To: at lists.ibiblio.orgHello. Could someone please explain to me why in Ephesians 2:1…
[] John 3:16 “so” Harold Holmyard hholmyard3 at earthlink.net Tue Dec 15 17:54:15 EST 2009 [] Capital theta in John 1:18? [] John 3:16 “so” Dear list,I have been studying a controversy in John 3:16:*John 3:16* οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον, ὥστε τὸν υἱὸν τὸν μονογενῆ ἔδωκεν, ἵνα πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων εἰς…
Dear friends,
what is the effect of putting αὐτοῦ before its Referent “τὰ ἔργα”:
John 3:21 Ὁ δὲ ποιῶν τὴν ἀλήθειαν ἔρχεται πρὸς τὸ φῶς, ἵνα φανερωθῇ αὐτοῦ τὰ ἔργα, ὅτι ἐν θεῷ ἐστιν εἰργασμένα.
Is it possible to translate this Feature? Maybe “his own deeds” or something similar? Then, additionally, how can the “truth” be done? Is it rather: to act according to truth?
Thanks for all help !
Yours
Peter, Germany
Statistics: Posted by Peter Streitenberger — November 27th, 2013, 7:44 am
1 Cor 3:15 (The force of the future indicative) Matt Eby ebymatt at yahoo.com Mon Apr 1 00:22:13 EST 2002 Rev. 3:3a 1 Cor 3:15 (The force of the future indicative) Greetings again Moon…> The future statement AUTOS DE SWQHSETAI is qualified> by hOUTWS DE hWS DIA PUROS. > > If we understand DIA…
Titus 3:5 Jim Crouch crouchjames at attbi.com Sun Jan 13 10:00:45 EST 2002 The Use of the word gold in the NT Titus 3:5 DIA LOUTROU PALIGGENESIAS KAI ANAKAINWSEWS PNEUMATOS hAGIOUIs it possible to read only one object of the preposition DIA (viz.,LUTROU) followed by two genitives of description (viz., PALIGGENESIAS KAIANAKAINWSEWS) with the…
OU DUNATAI hAMARTIAN in 1 John 3:9 Jay Adkins JAdkins264 at aol.com Wed Oct 20 09:00:02 EDT 1999 Present Tense OU DUNATAI hAMARTIAN in 1 John 3:9 Dear ers,I would like to hear your thoughts about what I think is a present tense verb followed by a present tense complementary infinitive OU DUNATAI hAMARTIAN in…
