Mark 16:17

Mark 16…

“`html An Exegetical Inquiry into Mark 16:17: Phonetics and Interpretation body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b.greek-word { font-family: “Gentium Plus”, “Palatino…

Mark 16:15

Mark 16 15    Participles And Imperatives

Grammatical and Rhetorical Analysis of Mark 16:15: The Aorist Participle and Imperative This exegetical study of Mark 16:15 is based on a b-greek discussion from Fri Dec 24 18:48:22 EST 2004. The initial query concerned the grammatical mood and tense of the verbs “Go” and “preach” in Mark 16:15, noting their appearance as an aorist…

Mark 16:14

Mark 16 Short Ending

An Exegetical Study of Mark 16:14 (Codex Washingtonianus Variant) This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of Mark 16:14 (Codex Washingtonianus Variant) is based on a b-greek discussion from Saturday, July 10, 2004. The initial query focused on a specific variant reading of Mark 16:14 found in Codex Washingtonianus (W), raising several grammatical and semantic…

Mark 14:57

Mark 14:57

“`html The Function of the Agentless Passive in Mark’s Gospel: An Exegetical Study of False Testimony in Mark 14:57-59 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 40px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #eee;…

Mark 8:12

Mark 8:12

An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 8:12: The Conditional Clause as Emphatic Negation This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 8:12: The Conditional Clause as Emphatic Negation is based on a b-greek discussion from Wed Jan 23 11:04:56 EST 2002. The initial query concerned the unexpected translation of the Greek conditional clause `εἰ δοθήσεται…

Mark 11:22

Exegetical Analysis of Genitive Constructions in Mark 11:22 and 2 Peter 3:9 This exegetical study of ‘Genitive Usage in 1 Peter 3:9 and Mark 11:22’ is based on a b-greek discussion from August 24, 1998. The initial inquiry centers on the translation of ἔχετε πίστιν Θεοῦ in Mark 11:22, questioning whether the genitive Θεοῦ should…

Mark 6:20

An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 6:20: The Grammatical Function of πολλα/πολλοῖς This exegetical study of Mark 6:20 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Jul 10 15:07:00 EDT 2003. The initial inquiry focused on the final clauses of Mark 6:20, which describe Herod’s reaction to John the Baptizer, specifically the phrase: και ακουσασ αυτου…

Mark 7:4

The Semantic Range of βαπτίζω and βαπτισμός in Mark 7:4: Ritual Purity and its Application This exegetical study of ‘The Semantic Range of βαπτίζω and βαπτισμός in Mark 7:4: Ritual Purity and its Application’ is based on a b-greek discussion from May 2, 2000. The initial inquiry posited that the word βαπτίζω (baptizō) is employed…

Acts 2:41

“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Acts 2:41: The Semantics of λογος and the Function of Particles μεν ουν body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3 { font-family: ‘Georgia’, serif; } b { font-weight: bold; } blockquote { border-left: 3px solid #ccc; margin-left: 20px; padding-left: 15px; font-style: italic; } ul…

Mark 6:22

An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 6:22: The Dancer and Herod’s Oath An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 6:22: The Dancer and Herod’s Oath This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 6:22: The Dancer and Herod’s Oath is based on a b-greek discussion from January 1, 2002. The initial communication saw a participant withdrawing previous…

Mark 6:12

“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 6:12-13: The Syntactic Scope of Participles and Verbal Hierarchy body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3, h4 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b.greek { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’,…

Martk 14:41

MK 14 41 APECEI

“`html An Exegetical Analysis of ἀπέχει in Mark 14:41 body { font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; color: #555; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px; }…

Mark 2:1

TA In Mark 2 1

An Exegetical Analysis of *τὰ πρὸς τὴν θύραν* in Mark 2:1-2 This exegetical study of *τα* in Mark 2:1 is based on a b-greek discussion from May 27, 1999. The initial inquiry concerns the phrase τὰ πρὸς τὴν θύραν in Mark 2:1 (subsequently identified as Mark 2:2), which Zerwick/Grosvenor translate as “space near the door.”…

Mark 10:11

Mark 10 11 12

An Exegetical Study of Mark 10:11-12: The Aspect of μοιχαται in Divorce and Remarriage An Exegetical Study of Mark 10:11-12: The Aspect of μοιχαται in Divorce and Remarriage This exegetical study of Mark 10:11-12 is based on a b-greek discussion from Saturday 14 February 2004. The initial query focused on the interpretation of the present…

Mark 5:9

Mark 5 9 LEGION demoniak

An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 5:9: The Singular and Plural in the Demoniac’s Response An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 5:9: The Singular and Plural in the Demoniac’s Response This exegetical study of Mark 5:9: The Singular and Plural in the Demoniac’s Response is based on a b-greek discussion from Thursday, December 22, 2005. The initial…

Mark 2:16

Mark 2 16 HOI GRAMMATEIS TWN FARISAIWN

This exegetical study of Mark 2:16, specifically the phrase οἱ γραμματεῖς τῶν Φαρισαίων, is based on a b-greek discussion from Monday, May 17, 1999. The initial inquiry arose from a perceived semantic tension in the phrase, as scribes and Pharisees were thought to be distinct entities. The question posed was how to interpret the genitive…

Mark 16:2

Mk 16 2 Constituent Order

The original content contained personal names and emails which have been removed in accordance with the specified rules. All Greek terms are enclosed in bold tags, and explanatory emphases are in italics. An Exegetical Analysis of Constituent Order in Mark 16:2 This exegetical study of Mk 16:2 Constituent Order is based on a b-greek discussion…

Mark 3:19

Mark 3 16 19  What A Strange Construction!

“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 3:13-19: Textual, Lexical, and Translational Challenges body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; margin-top: 1.5em; } h3 { font-size: 1.4em; margin-top: 1.2em; } p { margin-bottom: 1em; } blockquote { border-left: 3px solid…

Mark 16:18

Mark 16 18 AROUSIN

An Exegetical Study of Mark 16:18: The Translation of ἀροῦσιν in the Context of Serpent Encounters This exegetical study of Mark 16:18 αροῦσιν is based on a b-greek discussion from Tuesday, February 4, 2003. The initial query sought clarification regarding the translation of αροῦσιν in Mark 16:18, specifically in the phrase καὶ ἐν ταῖς χερσὶν…

Mark 8:7

Ekklesia

An Exegetical Study of ekklesia in the New Testament body { font-family: “Palatino Linotype”, “Book Antiqua”, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 40px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; background-color: #f9f9f9; }…