5 articles 2 Peter

2 Peter 2:2

2 Peter 2 2 Relative Pronoun   Which Antecedent

2 Peter 2:2 relative pronoun – which antecedent? Timothy Duke tduke at accsoft.com.au Wed May 26 08:24:08 EDT 1999   ICHQUS 2 Peter 2:2 relative pronoun – which antecedent? After a long time without a computer, I return to !2 Peter 2:2 reads:KAI POLLOI …AUTWN..DI’ hOUS…My question is this: which is the antecedent: POLLOI or…

2 Peter 2:22

EXERA(S)MA 2Peter 2 22

EXERA(S)MA 2Peter 2:22 Thomas J. Kraus tj.kraus at gmx.de Wed Jan 2 14:15:43 EST 2002   Septuagint Septuagint Dear colleagues,there is a minor textcritical issue related to 2Peter 2:22 where most andthe best of the witnesses read TO IDION EXERAMAHowever, there is quite a number of minuscules together with Codex Bezae whoattestTON IDION EXERASMA[A third…

Peter 1:2,3

2 Peter 1:2,3

I’m struggling with the grammar of II Peter 1:2,3. To which noun, God or Jesus Christ, do the pronouns in verse 3 relate to? Normally it would be the nearest antecedent. What other issues must be considered? 2 cavri” uJmi’n kaiV eijrhvnh plhqunqeivh ejn ejpignwvsei tou’ qeou’ kaiV jIhsou’ tou’ kurivou hJmw’n. 3 JW” pavnta…