An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 14:16 Regarding the Interpretation of ὁ ἀναπληρῶν τὸν τόπον τοῦ ἰδιώτου An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 14:16 Regarding the Interpretation of ὁ ἀναπληρῶν τὸν τόπον τοῦ ἰδιώτου This exegetical study of “1 Cor 14:16 and NET Bible’s translation” is based on a b-greek discussion from Sun Oct 17…
An Exegetical Study of Colossians 1:16: The Function of ἐν αὐτῷ in Christological Creation This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of Colossians 1:16: The Function of ἐν αὐτῷ in Christological Creation is based on a b-greek discussion from Fri Oct 8 14:22:52 EDT 1999. The initial inquiry concerns the grammatical classification of the dative…
An Exegetical Analysis of Romans 8:16 body { font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: serif; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; } h3 { font-size: 1.4em; } blockquote { font-style: italic; margin-left: 20px; border-left: 3px solid #ccc; padding-left: 10px; } b { font-weight: bold; }…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Romans 1:16 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; max-width: 900px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: Georgia, serif; color: #333; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.3em; margin-top: 1.5em; } h3 { font-size: 1.4em;…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Acts 16:34: The Grammatical Ambiguity of πανοικεὶ body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: 2em auto; padding: 0 1em; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: Georgia, serif; color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 2em;…
This exegetical study of Mark 2:16, specifically the phrase οἱ γραμματεῖς τῶν Φαρισαίων, is based on a b-greek discussion from Monday, May 17, 1999. The initial inquiry arose from a perceived semantic tension in the phrase, as scribes and Pharisees were thought to be distinct entities. The question posed was how to interpret the genitive…
An Exegetical Study of Mark 16:18: The Translation of ἀροῦσιν in the Context of Serpent Encounters This exegetical study of Mark 16:18 αροῦσιν is based on a b-greek discussion from Tuesday, February 4, 2003. The initial query sought clarification regarding the translation of αροῦσιν in Mark 16:18, specifically in the phrase καὶ ἐν ταῖς χερσὶν…
An Exegetical Analysis of John 3:16: The Force of οὕτως and ὥστε body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: Georgia, serif; } blockquote { border-left: 3px solid #ccc; margin-left: 0; padding-left: 10px; font-style: italic; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px; } b.greek {…
Stephen Hughes wrote: ↑October 24th, 2017, 11:29 amJonathan Robie wrote: ↑October 24th, 2017, 6:01 amI don’t want this to get lost – Timothy is correct here, and this is the one direct response to the question in the OP.ταυτη is not referring back to …
An Exegetical Examination of Mark 16:9: Syntactic Modifiers and Textual Considerations within the Longer Ending of Mark body { font-family: Georgia, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: 2em auto; padding: 0 1em; } h2, h3 { color: #2c3e50; border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.3em; margin-top: 2em; } blockquote { background: #f9f9f9; border-left: 5px solid #ccc;…
