An Exegetical Examination of 1 John 5:3: Grammatical and Rhetorical Considerations body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of John 20:22: The Imperative of Receiving the Holy Spirit An Exegetical Analysis of John 20:22: The Imperative of Receiving the Holy Spirit This exegetical study of “Breathing in Gen 2:7, John 20:22” is based on a b-greek discussion from Sun Feb 14 16:01:07 1999. The initial inquiry concerned a morphological…
RandallButh wrote:
Would someone please correct the Greek word in the thread title from the incorrect *ἀναβέβακεν to the correct form ἀναβέβηκεν?
Fixed! Sorry about the Doric form.
Statistics: Posted by Stephen Carlson — December 21st, 2013, 3:11 am
An Exegetical Examination of the Voice of δοξασθῇ in John 11:4 This exegetical study focuses on the verbal form δοξασθῇ (doxasthē) in John 11:4, a crucial component of a purpose clause explaining the significance of Lazarus’s illness. The central exegetical issue concerns the precise semantic nuance of this aorist passive subjunctive form: whether it functions…
Exegetical Analysis of John 7:39: The Nature and Presence of the Spirit John 7:39 presents a pivotal interpretive challenge regarding the nature and presence of the Spirit in the nascent Christian community. The exegetical issue centers on two primary linguistic features of the clause οὔπω γὰρ ἦν πνεῦμα: first, the anarthrous use of πνεῦμα (spirit/Spirit),…
An Exegetical Study of John 2:23: The Dative Plural of Ἱεροσόλυμα This exegetical study of John 2:23 is based on a b-greek discussion from April 3, 2002. The initial inquiry focused on the grammatical form of the word “Jerusalem” in John 2:23, specifically its appearance as a dative plural in the Greek text. The questioner…
“`html Exegetical Analysis of 1 John 2:20 An Exegetical Analysis of 1 John 2:20: Textual and Lexical Considerations The interpretation of 1 John 2:20 presents two primary exegetical challenges stemming from textual and lexical variations. Firstly, the grammatical case of the Greek term πάντες (pantes) dictates whether the passage refers to the collective knowledge of…
An Exegetical Study of 1 John 3:2 and 1 John 2:28 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; color: #333; } h2, h3 { color: #222; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.8em; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.5em; } h3 { font-size:…
“`html 1 John 2:2: An Exegetical Analysis of hHMETERWN δε μονον 1 John 2:2: An Exegetical Analysis of hHMETERWN δε μονον This exegetical study of 1 John 2:2: An Exegetical Analysis of hHMETERWN δε μονον is based on a b-greek discussion from July 16, 1999. The initial query sought clarification on the grammatical function of…
Lexical and Conjunctional Semantics: An Exegetical Study of λογος vs. ρημα and αλλα in 1 John 3:18 Lexical and Conjunctional Semantics: An Exegetical Study of λογος vs. ρημα and αλλα in 1 John 3:18 This exegetical study of *Lexical and Conjunctional Semantics in New Testament Greek* is based on a b-greek discussion from February 20,…
An Exegetical Examination of the Purpose Clauses in 1 John 3:5 and 3:8 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Examination of the Purpose Clauses in 1 John 3:5 and 3:8 is based on a b-greek discussion from October 14, 1999. The initial inquiry concerns the prevalent translation of subjunctive verbs within ἵνα clauses in 1…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of John 20:28: The Grammatical Function of the Nominative in Thomas’ Confession An Exegetical Analysis of John 20:28: The Grammatical Function of the Nominative in Thomas’ Confession This exegetical study of “Jn 20:28 – Grammatical difference between the nominative for vocative or of exclamation?” is based on a b-greek discussion from…
“`html An Exegetical Examination of the Referent of μετ’ αὐτοῦ in John 11:16 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: ‘Georgia’, serif; color: #333; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; margin-top: 1.5em; border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.3em; } h3 { font-size: 1.4em;…
An Exegetical Analysis of the Relative Pronoun in 3 John 5 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of the Relative Pronoun in 3 John 5 is based on a b-greek discussion from Mon Feb 16 2004. The initial inquiry from the discussion centered on the grammatical function of the relative pronoun ὃ in 3…
An Exegetical Analysis of the Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7-8) This exegetical study of the Comma Johanneum is based on a b-greek discussion from Wednesday, October 27, 1999. The initial inquiry concerned locating a visual representation, or “picture,” of the “Comma Johanneum,” a textual passage in 1 John 5:7-8, particularly within early manuscript traditions of…
An Exegetical Analysis of John 8:58: The Interpretation of “πρὶν Ἀβραὰμ γενέσθαι ἐγὼ εἰμί” This exegetical study of John 8:58 is based on a b-greek discussion from Tuesday, April 16, 2002. The initial discourse introduces Kenneth L. McKay’s categorization of the construction as “Extension from Past,” elaborating that when a present tense verb is paired…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of John 8:32: Knowledge, Freedom, and Soteriological Process body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 40px; } h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { font-style: italic; margin-left: 20px; padding-left: 15px; border-left: 3px solid #ccc; color: #555; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px; } ol…
An Exegetical Analysis of διδάσκαλος in John 3:2 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of διδάσκαλος in John 3:2 is based on a b-greek discussion from May 19, 1999. The initial query concerned the grammatical classification of the nominative noun διδάσκαλος in John 3:2, specifically within Nicodemus’ statement to Jesus, “ἀπὸ θεοῦ ἐλήλυθας διδάσκαλος.”…
“`html An Exegetical Examination of John 17:3: The Granville Sharp Rule and Christological Implications body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 30px; } h3 { color: #555; margin-top: 20px; } p { margin-bottom: 1em;…
“`html John 17:23: The Periphrastic Perfect Subjunctive Construction This exegetical study of John 17:23 is based on a b-greek discussion from August 18, 2002. The initial inquiry highlighted a specific grammatical construction in John 17:23: ἵνα ὦσιν τετελειωμένοι εἰς ἕν. The observer noted the presence of a subjunctive finite verb (ὦσιν) combined with a perfect…
