An Exegetical Analysis of **ἐν τῇ κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ** in Revelation 1:10 This exegetical study of The Meaning of **ἐν τῇ κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ** in Revelation 1:10 is based on a b-greek discussion from December 1, 2003. The initial discussion highlighted that the prevalent interpretation of “Lord’s day” in Revelation 1:10 as Sunday relies not on internal…
Rev 4.11 (breaking of Sharp’s Rule) Dave Washburn dwashbur at nyx.net Thu Jun 21 05:28:59 εδτ 2001 Rev 4.9 (Double Accentuation) Rev 4.11 (breaking of Sharp’s Rule) > Revelation 4.11> αχιοσ ει, hO κυριοσ και hO θεοσ hHMWN,> λαβειν θν δοχαν και θν τιμην και θν δυναμιν,> hOTI συ εκτισασ τα παντα> και δια…
Stephen Carlson wrote:
Per BDAG μηδείς 2bβ (p. 647), μηδέν = in no way
Ah I see. That makes perfect sense, though I don’t have BDAG. 
Stephen Hughes wrote:Stephen Carlson wrote:Per BDAG μηδείς 2bβ (p. 647), μηδέν = in no wayIt seems weaker than examples like:
Luke 4:35 wrote:
Καὶ ἐπετίμησεν αὐτῷ ὁ Ἰησοῦς, λέγων, Φιμώθητι, καὶ ἔξελθε ἐξ αὐτοῦ. Καὶ ῥίψαν αὐτὸν τὸ δαιμόνιον εἰς μέσον ἐξῆλθεν ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ, μηδὲν βλάψαν αὐτόν.Acts 16:28 wrote:
Ἐφώνησεν δὲ φωνῇ μεγάλῃ ὁ Παῦλος λέγων, Μηδὲν πράξῃς σεαυτῷ κακόν· ἅπαντες γάρ ἐσμεν ἐνθάδε.
Thanks for the examples!
Stephen Hughes wrote:
Compare this instance, though, where οὐ is used different to οὐδένMark 14:60 wrote:Καὶ ἀναστὰς ὁ ἀρχιερεὺς εἰς μέσον ἐπηρώτησεν τὸν Ἰησοῦν, λέγων, Οὐκ ἀποκρίνῃ οὐδέν; Τί οὗτοί σου καταμαρτυροῦσιν;
Isn’t this just the double negative, where “ουκ αποκρινη ουδεν” just means “do you not answer anything?”
Statistics: Posted by David Lim — June 25th, 2014, 6:26 am
An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 4:3: The Grammatical Function of Dative Nouns in Describing Divine Appearance The present exegetical study addresses a grammatical and semantic question arising from Revelation 4:3, specifically concerning the precise function of the dative nouns ἰάσπιδι (iaspidi) and σαρδίῳ (sardiō) in relation to λίθῳ (lithō) and ὁράσει (horasei). The primary issue…
Exegetical Study of Revelation 22:2: The Tree of Life and the River of Life Exegetical Study of Revelation 22:2: The Tree of Life and the River of Life This exegetical study of The Tree of Life in Rev. 22:2 is based on a b-greek discussion from Wed May 10 12:58:42 EDT 2006. The initial inquiry…
An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 4:9: Textual Variants and Accentuation Issues This exegetical study of Rev 4.9 (Double Accentuation) is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Jun 21 03:02:55 EDT 2001. The initial inquiry concerns an apparent double accent on the word θρόνῳ (dative singular of θρόνος) in Revelation 4:9 as observed in a…
“`html Textual Variants in Revelation 11:15 and 22:19: The Influence of the Latin Vulgate on the Textus Receptus body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h2, h3 { color: #2C3E50; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #BDC3C7; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b {…
An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 9:14 An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 9:14: The Grammatical Scope of the Prepositional Phrase Revelation 9:14 presents a concise but grammatically significant passage that invites exegetical scrutiny, particularly regarding the syntactic function of the prepositional phrase ἐπὶ τῷ ποταμῷ τῷ μεγάλῳ Εὐφράτῃ (epi tō potamō tō megalō Euphratē). The primary…
“`html An Exegetical Study of Revelation 20:4 body { font-family: “Times New Roman”, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left:…
point taken.
Just keeping the interface with prosopa clean.
Statistics: Posted by RandallButh — March 10th, 2014, 2:40 am
