9 articles 2 Thessalonians

2 Thessalonians 2:2

2 Thessalonians 2:2

An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:2 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em auto; max-width: 800px; color: #333; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #2C3E50; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; } h1 { font-size: 2.2em; text-align: center; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; border-bottom: 1px solid #CCC; padding-bottom: 0.3em; }…

2 Thessalonians 2:11

An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:11: The Function of the Definite Article in τῷ ψεύδει The biblical text of 2 Thessalonians 2:11 presents an intriguing exegetical challenge, particularly concerning the precise nuance and translation of the phrase εἰς τὸ πιστεῦσαι αὐτοὺς τῷ ψεύδει. This passage describes a divine judgment upon those who reject the…

2 Thessalonians 2:13

The following exegetical analysis examines 2 Thessalonians 2:13, focusing on key grammatical and textual issues that significantly impact its interpretation and translation. Specifically, this study addresses the syntactic scope and semantic function of the preposition ἐν with its two dative objects, ἁγιασμῷ πνεύματος and πίστει ἀληθείας, and their relationship to εἰς σωτηρίαν. Furthermore, critical attention…

2 Thessalonians 1:12

2 Thessalonians 1:12

“`html An Exegetical Study of 2 Thessalonians 1:12: The Application of Granville Sharp’s Rule An Exegetical Study of 2 Thessalonians 1:12: The Application of Granville Sharp’s Rule This exegetical study of Granville Sharp and 2 Thess 1:12 is based on a b-greek discussion from Tue Apr 11 08:01:06 EDT 2000. The initial inquiry posed the…

2 Thessalonians 2:4

2 Thes 2,4

Syntactic Analysis of ἀποδεικνύντα in 2 Thessalonians 2:4 This exegetical study of Syntactic Ambiguity in 2 Thessalonians 2:4 is based on a b-greek discussion from May 7, 2004. The initial query concerned the grammatical function of the participle ἀποδεικνύντα within 2 Thessalonians 2:4. Specifically, a prior grammatical diagram had suggested that ἀποδεικνύντα directly modifies ναόν…

2 Thessalonians 2:3

2 Thes 2 3a

An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:3a: Temporal Relationships and Lexical Ambiguities This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:3a: Temporal Relationships and Lexical Ambiguities is based on a b-greek discussion from Wed Jul 21 22:21:36 EDT 2004. The initial query focused on the NET Bible’s translation of 2 Thessalonians 2:3a, specifically…

2 Thessalonians 3:11

New Testament • Re: 2 Thes. 3:11 Is this humour?μηδὲν ἐργαζομένους, ἀλλὰ περ
Robert Crowe wrote:
There is a remarkable contradiction here with the Hindu ideal, where doing nothing is promoted as a way of attaining nirvana. “When we are doing something, we are only ever doing one thing; but when we’re doing nothing, we are doing absolutely nothing.”
cwconrad wrote:
In a slightly different context, I think of Cicero’s claim that he’s always felt he should be engaged in some megotium or else in some “honorable” form of otium (I think that’s the opening of De Oratore) “Leisure” is too easily associated with “laziness” or moral weakness, “idleness” — “the devil’s workshop.” The final stanza of Catullus’ recreation of Sappho’s grand litany of erotic envy sermonizes about the same “devil’s workshop” otium, μηδὲν ἐργάζεσθαι:

Catullus 5 wrote:otium, Catulle, tibi molestumest;
olio exsultas nimiumque gestis.
otium reges pries et beatas
perdidit urbes

That’s impossible to do justice to; it’s something like, “Your problem, Catullus, is having nothing to do; you’re overindulging, bloated on idleness; having nothing to do has been the ruination of monarchs and civilizations.”

If Standard Average European (SAE) was a reference to a Kulturbund rather than a Sprachbund, we would be able see quite clearly at least from the above statements that Ancient India was not part of the region. :lol:

The area covered by the Roman Empire politically, and the area influenced by Roman culture continues to foster the values of Roman society and civilisation, and those value seem familiar to us. In other words, it seems that the authour if 2 Thessalonians was working with a recognised sentiment, rather than introducing a wholly novel concept.

Statistics: Posted by Stephen Hughes — August 16th, 2016, 12:30 am


2 Thessalonians 2:15

2 Thessalonians 2:15

“`html An Exegetical Analysis of the Anarthrous ἐπιστολῆς in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 An Exegetical Analysis of the Anarthrous ἐπιστολῆς in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of the Anarthrous ἐπιστολῆς in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 is based on an online discussion forum. The initial query examines the assertion by W. Marxsen regarding…

2 Thessalonians 1:5

2 Thessalonians 1:5

An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 1:5-7: The Nature of Divine Judgment and Worthiness This exegetical study of 2 Thessalonians 1:5-7 is based on a b-greek discussion. The initial inquiry revolves around identifying the precise referent of the term ἔνδειγμα (evidence, proof) in verse 5. Specifically, the discussion questioned whether the suffering of the Thessalonian…