Exegetical Considerations in Hebrews 6:1: The Voice of φερώμεθα The interpretation of Hebrews 6:1 presents a significant exegetical challenge, particularly concerning the verb φερώμεθα. This passage exhorts believers to move beyond elementary doctrines towards spiritual maturity. The precise understanding of φερώμεθα—whether it functions primarily as a passive (“let us be carried/brought forward”) or a middle…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of the Article’s Absence Before ‘Joseph’ in Luke 3:23 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; max-width: 800px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 2em; } h3 { color: #555;…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Ephesians 3:18-19: The Grammatical Relationship of Infinitives and the Scope of Comprehension This exegetical study of “An Exegetical Analysis of Ephesians 3:18-19: The Grammatical Relationship of Infinitives and the Scope of Comprehension” is based on a b-greek discussion from an unspecified date, initiated by an inquiry into the logical flow…
Timothy,
Thanks for he correction, you are right of course. You response highlights what I was trying to get at… namely are there a clear grammatical reasons for the way Paul constructs this passage or is do we have to rely more on logical inference for the antecedents? I am not sufficiently familiar with relative pronoun constructions to know if this is a typical structure. My observation for what its worth (very little probably) is that Paul has opted for a certain amount of rhetorical beauty and balance, a sort of aesthetic quality for effect, almost poetic! Obviously the over all context makes it clear what he means.
Paul Evans
Wilmington, NC
Statistics: Posted by Paul Evans — October 19th, 2013, 9:35 am
This exegetical study of “A Philological and Rhetorical Analysis of James 3:16: Investigating a Proposed Wordplay on Παῦλος” is based on a b-greek discussion from August 27th, 2013. The initial inquiry proposes a potential wordplay within the phrase πᾶν φαῦλον πρᾶγμα (“every worthless thing”) in James 3:16, suggesting a hidden allusion to Παῦλος (“Paul”), thus…
An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 1:5-7: The Nature of Divine Judgment and Worthiness This exegetical study of 2 Thessalonians 1:5-7 is based on a b-greek discussion. The initial inquiry revolves around identifying the precise referent of the term ἔνδειγμα (evidence, proof) in verse 5. Specifically, the discussion questioned whether the suffering of the Thessalonian…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of παρρησία in the Book of Acts This exegetical study, originating from a modern query regarding the term παρρησία in Acts, addresses its semantic range beyond the common translation of “boldness” or “confidence.” The initial observation notes that, particularly in passages such as Acts 4:13, the term appears to convey more…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Peter 3:12: Interpreting the Participles and Accusative body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; max-width: 900px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b…
An Exegetical Analysis of **πίστος** in Titus 1:6: Familial Responsibility and Ecclesiastical Leadership Qualifications This exegetical study of **πίστος** in Titus 1:6 is based on a b-greek discussion from Sat Sep 18 16:46:20 1999. The initial inquiry centers on the precise meaning of **τέκνα ἔχων πιστά** in Titus 1:6, questioning whether **πίστος** should be understood…
An Exegetical Analysis of Grammatical and Christological Issues in Luke 2:48 and John 17:3 This exegetical study, addressing specific grammatical and theological questions related to Luke 2:48 and John 17:3, is based on an online discussion concerning Greek New Testament interpretation. The initial query concerns the grammatical status of κἀγὼ in Luke 2:48, questioning whether…
“`html Lexical Nuances in New Testament Forgiveness Terminology: A Comparative Study of ἀφίημι and χαρίζομαι This exegetical study of Lexical Nuances in New Testament Forgiveness Terminology is based on an online scholarly discussion. The initial observation highlights a distinct pattern in the New Testament: the verb ἀφίημι is predominantly employed in the Gospels and Acts…
“`html An Exegetical Examination of Adjectival Placement in Mark 13:26 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #2C3E50; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 2em; } h3 { color: #34495E; margin-top: 1.5em; } blockquote {…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Matthean Genealogy: The Anaphoric Article in Matthew 1:6 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: 2em auto; padding: 0 1em; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 2em; } h3 { margin-top: 1.5em; } blockquote…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of 1 Corinthians 11:6: The Semantic Range of Hair Trimming and Shaving This exegetical study of 1 Corinthians 11:6 is based on a b-greek discussion concerning the nuances of specific verbal forms. The original query sought clarification on the precise meaning of κείρασθαι and ξυρᾶσθαι within this verse, particularly whether they…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Philippians 3:20: Re-evaluating the Semantic Range of ἀπεκδέχομαι body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b { font-weight: bold;…
An Exegetical Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Nuances in 2 Peter 3:9, 13 This exegetical study of 2 Peter 3:9, 13 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Dec 1 15:45:19 2005. The initial inquiry centered on discerning any significant semantic distinction between the terms ἐπαγγελία and ἐπάγγελμα as employed in 2 Peter 3:9…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Matthew 11:29: The Syntactic Function of the ὅτι-Clause body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, Palatino, ‘Book Antiqua’, Georgia, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em…
This exegetical study of the double article in ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου is based on a b-greek discussion. The original inquiry pondered the significance of the double definite article in the phrase ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (the Son of the Man), a self-designation frequently employed by Jesus. It highlighted its use in pivotal moments, such…
22 Ἄνδρες Ἰσραηλῖται, ἀκούσατε τοὺς λόγους τούτους. Ἰησοῦν τὸν Ναζωραῖον, ἄνδρα ⸂ἀποδεδειγμένον ἀπὸ τοῦ θεοῦ⸃ εἰς ὑμᾶς δυνάμεσι καὶ τέρασι καὶ σημείοις οἷς ἐποίησεν διʼ αὐτοῦ ὁ θεὸς ἐν μέσῳ ὑμῶν, ⸀καθὼς αὐτοὶ οἴδατε, 23 τοῦτον τῇ ὡρισμένῃ βουλῇ καὶ προγνώσει τοῦ θεοῦ ⸀ἔκδοτον διὰ ⸀χειρὸς ἀνόμων προσπήξαντες ἀνείλατε,
It looks to me like the Ἰησοῦν τὸν Ναζωραῖον in vs. 22 is the direct object of ἀνείλατε at the end of vs. 23.
Is that correct? If so, it looks like Luke is putting the emphasis on Who Died and Who Did The Killing.
Statistics: Posted by Rhoover60 — February 6th, 2017, 9:28 pm
An Exegetical Study of Revelation 13:15-17: Agency of the Beast and its Image This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of Revelation 13:15-17: Agency of the Beast and its Image is based on a b-greek discussion from Mon Jul 12 17:27:27 EDT 1999. The initial query presented the Greek text of Revelation 13:15-17 and…
