An Exegetical Analysis of Galatians 4:30 This exegetical study of ‘Gal 4:30 λεγει as a Perfective Present?’ is based on a b-greek discussion from May 30, 1999. The initial inquiry focused on several grammatical and syntactical aspects of Galatians 4:30, specifically questioning whether the verb λεγει should be understood as a “perfective present” indicative of…
An Exegetical Analysis of Galatians 4:29: The Nature of its Comparison and Eschatological Implications This exegetical study of ‘Gal 4:29 What type of conditional?’ is based on a b-greek discussion from Saturday, May 29, 1999. The initial inquiry posited that Galatians 4:29 functions as a conditional sentence, marked by the particles ὥσπερ (protasis) and οὕτως…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of the Genitive in Galatians 4:28: τέκνα ἐπαγγελίας body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; color: #333; background-color: #fdfdfd; } h1, h2, h3 { font-family: Georgia, serif; color: #1a1a1a; margin-top: 2em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom:…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Genitives in Romans 2:4 An Exegetical Analysis of Genitives in Romans 2:4 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of Genitives in Romans 2:4 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Feb 6 03:14:29 EST 2003. The initial inquiry raised a question concerning the grammatical construction of Romans 2:4,…
“`html An Exegetical Study of Revelation 20:4 body { font-family: “Times New Roman”, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left:…
“`html An Exegetical Study of 1 John 4:19: The Mood of ἀγαπῶμεν An Exegetical Study of 1 John 4:19: The Mood of ἀγαπῶμεν This exegetical study of 1 John 4:19 is based on a b-greek discussion from May 19, 2007. The initial inquiry focused on the grammatical mood of the verb ἀγαπῶμεν within the sentence…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Syntactic Ambiguity in Ephesians 4:12 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: Georgia, serif; color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b { font-weight: bold; }…
An Exegetical Study of Paul’s Metaphor of Spiritual Travail in Galatians 4:19 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 25px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; } p { margin-bottom: 10px; } blockquote { border-left:…
Gregory Hartzler-Miller wrote:
I am experimenting with a perhaps novel argument to explain the textual variant in Gal 4:14 — καὶ τὸν πειρασμν μου [ὑμῶν] ἐν τῇ σαρκί μου. I would like feedback on the argument.Thesis: μου is Paul’s wording/intention, and ὑμῶν is a later interpretation of his meaning.
To Stephen Carlson and all,
I have studied Carlson’s wonderful dissertation on the text of Galatians. I stand corrected. The combination of high quality manuscripts (as assessed using by state of the art stemmatics analysis) and the principle of the more difficult reading weigh overwhelmingly in favor of καὶ τὸν πειρασμν ὑμῶν ἐν τῇ σαρκί μου
Best,
Gregory
Statistics: Posted by Gregory Hartzler-Miller — August 6th, 2016, 4:56 am
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 8:4 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h2, h3 { color: #333; margin-top: 25px; margin-bottom: 15px; } p { margin-bottom: 10px; } blockquote { border-left: 3px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; color: #555; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px;…
Exegetical Study of 1 Timothy 2:4-5 This exegetical study of 1 Timothy 2:4-5 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Nov 2 11:20:39 EST 2006. The initial query in the discussion, as presented in the primary content, challenged the assumption that the Greek relative pronoun ὅς (hos) in 1 Timothy 2:4 inherently carries a…
