[] Jude 4: TOUTO TO KRIMA Joel Barnes joel at barnzee.ca Wed Dec 15 12:51:57 EST 2004 [] LIQON ZWNTA and LIQOI ZWNTES in 1 Peter 2:4 & 5 [] LIQON ZWNTA and LIQOI ZWNTES in 1 Peter 2:4 & 5 Dear Everyone,It was recently suggested to me that KRIMA in Jude 4 means…
[] Eph 1:4 EN AUTW Andrew Batishko abatish at xmission.com Tue Aug 8 08:30:18 EDT 2006 [] Why Monotonic Greek. Was: Free Polytonic Uncial GreekUnicode Font? [] Eph 1:4 EN AUTW I’m only just now starting to learn biblical greek on my own, so forgive me if the answer to this is obvious.Ephesians 1:4…
[] Ephesians 1:3-4 Joe Hightower boeinguy2 at yahoo.com Fri Jul 28 12:47:05 EDT 2006 [] Romans 4:1 [] Ephesians 1:3-4 I am wrestling with an issue involving the word kathos (KAQWS for those who use the system). There are several definitions for this including ‘just as’, according to’ or ‘basis’, which can be applied.…
Gal 4:30 LEGEI as a Perfective Present? Joseph Brian Tucker music at riverviewcog.org Sun May 30 20:06:10 EDT 1999 Gal 4:29 What type of conditional? Gal 4:30 LEGEI as a Perfective Present? GreetingsThe contextual (introductory formula) perfective present seems to best describe LEGEI this way. That is, the statement was spoken in the past,…
Gal 4:29 What type of conditional? Joseph Brian Tucker music at riverviewcog.org Sat May 29 23:33:25 EDT 1999 AORIST VS PRESENT INFINITIVE Gal 4:29 What type of conditional? GreetingsGal 4:29 seems to be a conditional sentence. The particles hOSPER (protasis) and hOUTWS (apodosis) seem to relate to TOTE (protasis) and NUN (apodosis). My question…
Gal 4:28 EPAGGELIAS what type Jim West jwest at highland.net Thu May 27 15:44:22 EDT 1999 Gal 4:28 EPAGGELIAS what type Gal 4:28 EPAGGELIAS what type At 03:29 PM 5/27/99 +0000, you wrote:>Greetings> >I am working through Gal 4:28 and I am wrestling with the phrase EPAGGELIAS >TEKNA. What is the best way to…
[] Genitives in Rom. 2:4 Byron & Linetta Knutson byronk at open.org Thu Feb 6 03:14:29 EST 2003 [] number of AW, EW, and OO verbs in NT [] Genitives in Rom. 2:4 I was wondering why the string of genitives in this verse rather than accusatives (excluding THS CRHSTOTHTOS)? Is there a simple…
erasmus and rev. Kevin W. Woodruff cierpke at prodigy.net Sun Sep 5 20:56:28 EDT 1999 3 questions erasmus and rev. Jim and others:I was always under the impression that Erasmus had in his work _Annotationson the New Testament_ (Novum Testamentum Annotationes) confessed (forgive meif my Latin is faulty):…quanquam in calce hujus libri, nonulla verba…
Luke 4:5 Rick Strelan rick.strelan at mailbox.uq.edu.au Fri May 7 02:52:01 EDT 1999 Hebrews 11:1 Heb 2:17 My question raises not a Greek linguistic problem [in terms of grammar orvocabulary], but certainly one of meaning! What do people understand by Lk4:5 when Satan shows Jesus all the kingdoms EN STIGMi CRONOU? This suggeststhat both characters…
[] 1 John 4:19 Andy Kaylor andy_kaylor at yahoo.com Sat May 19 04:53:50 EDT 2007 [] Gender [] 1 John 4:19 I’m a newbie working through 1 John, and tonight I was looking at 1 John 4:19hHMEIS AGAPWMEN hOTI AUTOS PRWTOS HGAPHSEN hHMASMy first thought was that AGAPWMEN was subjunctive, so I Englished it as…
James 4:5 Steven Cox scox at Mail.Sparkice.COM.CN Mon Jul 19 23:32:11 EDT 1999 book James 4:5 Where is James quoting from?PROS FQONON EPIPOQEI TO PNEUMA hO KATWiKISEN EN hUMINSteven bookJames 4:5 James 4:5 N & RJ Hanscamp nar.hanscamp at clear.net.nz Tue Jul 20 00:37:24 EDT 1999 James 4:5 Greek courses >Where is…
Ephesians 4:12 Jay Anthony Adkins Jadkins26438 at cs.com Thu Jul 11 08:43:27 EDT 2002 ERCESQAI, 1 Ephesians 4:12 Dear ‘s,While my efforts to use the Lyris search engine failed, I seem to vaguelyremember a discussion a few years ago on Ephesians 4:12 and the placementor removal of a comma, which could in turn alter…
Gal. 4:19 Thomas Biddy web3943 at charweb.org Mon Jun 29 23:28:47 EDT 1998 1 Cor 14:34-35 KJV on “which” 5605. odino, o-dee’-no; from G5604; to experience the pains of parturition (lit. or fig.):–travail in (birth).(Gal 4:19 KJV) My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,Does this…
Gregory Hartzler-Miller wrote:
I am experimenting with a perhaps novel argument to explain the textual variant in Gal 4:14 — καὶ τὸν πειρασμν μου [ὑμῶν] ἐν τῇ σαρκί μου. I would like feedback on the argument.Thesis: μου is Paul’s wording/intention, and ὑμῶν is a later interpretation of his meaning.
To Stephen Carlson and all,
I have studied Carlson’s wonderful dissertation on the text of Galatians. I stand corrected. The combination of high quality manuscripts (as assessed using by state of the art stemmatics analysis) and the principle of the more difficult reading weigh overwhelmingly in favor of καὶ τὸν πειρασμν ὑμῶν ἐν τῇ σαρκί μου
Best,
Gregory
Statistics: Posted by Gregory Hartzler-Miller — August 6th, 2016, 4:56 am
For what it’s worth, I’d certainly agree with Stirling that these datives, given the position in which they appear, ought not to be deemed datives of agent with ἠγοράσθησαν here.
Statistics: Posted by cwconrad — May 19th, 2014, 4:34 pm
Syntax Mark 8:4 Jim West jwest at highland.net Mon May 3 07:30:10 EDT 1999 Syntax Mark 8:4 subjunctive contingency At 07:02 AM 5/3/99 +0000, you wrote:>I think the basic intent of the passage is clear, but I am having trouble >on just how best to translate the passage for myself as a result, (I…
[] 1 Timothy 2:4-5 George F Somsel gfsomsel at yahoo.com Sat Mar 19 11:07:55 EDT 2011 [] 1 Timothy 2:4-5 [] 1 Timothy 2:4-5 I would say that whoever wishes to understand ὅς hOS as having a causal meaning needs to provide some proof that such can indeed be the case — which I don’t…
