An Exegetical Examination of Mark 5:7 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 900px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { background: #f9f9f9; border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } ul…
An Exegetical Study of Mark 6:8b: The Grammatical Function of `ει μη` in the Missionary Instructions This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of Mark 6:8b: The Grammatical Function of `ει μη` in the Missionary Instructions is based on a b-greek discussion from Sat May 27 18:04:26 EDT 2006. The initial discussion raised a critical…
“`html The Function of the Agentless Passive in Mark’s Gospel: An Exegetical Study of False Testimony in Mark 14:57-59 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 40px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #eee;…
An Exegetical Study of Jesus’ Sayings in Mark 8:23 and 8:26 This exegetical study of Jesus’ Sayings in Mark 8:23 and 8:26 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Jul 29 14:53:05 1999. The initial inquiry concerned the Greek text of Mark 8:23, specifically the phrase εἴ τι βλέπεις, and Mark 8:26, with the…
An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 8:12: The Conditional Clause as Emphatic Negation This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of Mark 8:12: The Conditional Clause as Emphatic Negation is based on a b-greek discussion from Wed Jan 23 11:04:56 EST 2002. The initial query concerned the unexpected translation of the Greek conditional clause `εἰ δοθήσεται…
An Exegetical Analysis of ἔνοχος ἐστίν in Mark 3:29 This exegetical study of ‘the sense of ενοχοσ εστιν (Mk 3:29)’ is based on a b-greek discussion from December 5, 1999. The initial query in the discussion centered on the interpretation of the Greek phrase ἔνοχος ἐστίν in Mark 3:29. The inquirer sought to understand if…
The Semantic Nuance of εκβαλλει in Mark 1:12: Examining the Spirit’s Action This exegetical study of “εκβαλλει: simple word in strange context (Mk 1:12)?” is based on a b-greek discussion from February 20, 2003. The initial inquiry arose from an observation made during the development of a commentary on Mark’s Gospel, highlighting an “obvious” yet…
“`html An Exegetical Study of Mark 16:4 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, Times, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 850px; margin: 20px auto; padding: 20px; color: #333; background-color: #fdfdfd; border: 1px solid #eee; box-shadow: 0 0 10px rgba(0,0,0,0.05); } h2, h3 { font-family: Georgia, serif; color: #2C3E50; margin-top: 1.8em; margin-bottom: 0.8em; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom:…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of ἀπέχει in Mark 14:41 body { font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; color: #555; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px; }…
Levinsohn is using strengthening as a technical term. It is a fallacy to assume that a technical term means what the non-technical meaning might suggest. One has to study his usage of the term to understand what it means. I haven’t seen any disagreement yet on the actual substance, just unwarranted extrapolations from the particular name he gave to the function. Labels aren’t definitions.
Statistics: Posted by Stephen Carlson — June 26th, 2014, 11:39 am
