An Exegetical Analysis of **οὕτως καὶ** in 1 Corinthians 15:45 This exegetical study of ‘hOUTWS **και** in 1 Cor 15.45’ is based on a b-greek discussion from September 5, 2004. The initial query examines 1 Corinthians 15:45, focusing on the interpretative scope of the adverb **οὕτως**. While it is recognized that **οὕτως** typically refers to…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Gendered Language in 1 Corinthians 14:26-33 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of Gendered Language in 1 Corinthians 14:26-33 is based on a b-greek discussion from Mon Nov 5 2001. The initial contention posits that the frequent use of masculine singular nouns and pronouns, such as ἕκαστος, εἷς, ἑαυτῷ,…
An Exegetical Examination of 1 Corinthians 14:37-38 and the Textual Variant of ἀγνοέω This exegetical study of 1 Corinthians 14:37-38 is based on a b-greek discussion from Fri May 5 18:33:38 EDT 2006. The initial inquiry focused on a significant textual variant in 1 Corinthians 14:38, specifically the choice between ἀγνοεῖται (indicative passive) and ἀγνοείτω…
An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 14:16 Regarding the Interpretation of ὁ ἀναπληρῶν τὸν τόπον τοῦ ἰδιώτου An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 14:16 Regarding the Interpretation of ὁ ἀναπληρῶν τὸν τόπον τοῦ ἰδιώτου This exegetical study of “1 Cor 14:16 and NET Bible’s translation” is based on a b-greek discussion from Sun Oct 17…
An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 7:10-11: The Nuance of Separation and Divorce This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 7:10-11: The Nuance of Separation and Divorce is based on a b-greek discussion from October 6, 1999. The initial inquiry from a participant in an online discussion forum focused on the grammatical…
An Exegetical Analysis of ἀπαρχή in 1 Corinthians 15:20 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { margin-top: 1.5em; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee; padding-bottom: 0.5em; } h3 { margin-top: 1.2em; color: #555; } p { margin-bottom: 1em; text-align:…
An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 13:8 and 12:31: Verbal Semantics and Grammatical Mood This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 13:8 and 12:31: Verbal Semantics and Grammatical Mood is based on a b-greek discussion from Tue Feb 16 19:50:55 EST 1999. The initial discussion revolved around a specific English translation of…
“`html Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 15:2 body { font-family: “Palatino Linotype”, “Book Antiqua”, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 40px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #eee; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } ul { list-style-type: disc;…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of the Structure and Semantic Relationship of the hOTAN Clauses in 1 Corinthians 15:24 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of the Structure and Semantic Relationship of the hOTAN Clauses in 1 Corinthians 15:24 is based on a b-greek discussion from April 9, 2002. The initial contribution to the discussion…
An Exegetical Study of 2 Corinthians 6:10: The Semantic Nuance of ἔχοντες and κατέχοντες This exegetical study of 2 Corinthians 6:10 is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Sep 2 12:58:53 EDT 1999. The initial inquiry sought to understand the distinction Paul intended between the terms ἔχοντες (having) and κατέχοντες (possessing) within the paradoxical…
An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Corinthians 6:1: The Semantic Range and Syntactic Function of **παρακαλέω** This exegetical study of 2 Corinthians 6:1 is based on a b-greek discussion from January 5, 2003. The initial query noted that the verb **παρακαλέω** and its cognate noun **παράκλησις** occur frequently in 2 Corinthians 1-7, often conveying the sense…
An Exegetical Analysis of 1 Corinthians 12:11: Grammatical Subjectivity and Adverbial Function This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of 1 Corinthians 12:11: Grammatical Subjectivity and Adverbial Function is based on a b-greek discussion from Wed Oct 27 09:58:45 EDT 1999. The initial inquiry concerned the syntactic rules governing the agent of the verb βούλεται…
An Exegetical Analysis of `ἐπίσημοι ἐν τοῖς ἀποστόλοις` in Romans 16:7 and the Semantic Range of `ἀπόστολος` This exegetical study of “episemoi en tois apostolois” is based on a b-greek discussion from Sun Aug 29 02:11:27 EDT 2004. The initial discussion highlights the crucial semantic question regarding the term `ἀπόστολος` (apostle), questioning whether it should…
“`html An Exegetical Examination of the Infinitive Tense in 1 Corinthians 15:25 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } p { margin-bottom: 1em; } ul { margin-left: 2em; list-style-type: disc; } ol { margin-left: 2em; } b { font-weight: bold; } i {…
The Nature of Paul’s ‘Thorn in the Flesh’ in 2 Corinthians 12:7 This exegetical study of The Nature of Paul’s ‘Thorn in the Flesh’ in 2 Corinthians 12:7 is based on a b-greek discussion from May 23, 2004. The initial inquiry raised the question of the common English translation of ἄγγελος (angelos) in 2 Corinthians…
I appreciate what you’re trying to do, but my questions about this clause are not really about its pragmatics but just the low-level stuff of figuring out subjects, antecedents, referents, etc.
Statistics: Posted by Stephen Carlson — December 27th, 2016, 8:58 am
An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 3:15: The Force of the Future Indicative in a Context of Eschatological Judgment This exegetical study of 1 Cor 3:15 (The force of the future indicative) is based on a b-greek discussion from April 1, 2002. The initial inquiry concerns the interpretation of Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 3:15,…
