An Exegetical Examination of 1 John 5:3: Grammatical and Rhetorical Considerations body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em…
An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 4:3: The Grammatical Function of Dative Nouns in Describing Divine Appearance The present exegetical study addresses a grammatical and semantic question arising from Revelation 4:3, specifically concerning the precise function of the dative nouns ἰάσπιδι (iaspidi) and σαρδίῳ (sardiō) in relation to λίθῳ (lithō) and ὁράσει (horasei). The primary issue…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Romans 3:9: The Conjunction τε και and the Universal Scope of Sin body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; color: #333; margin: 0 auto; max-width: 900px; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #2c3e50; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 30px; } h3…
“`html The Function of the Agentless Passive in Mark’s Gospel: An Exegetical Study of False Testimony in Mark 14:57-59 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 40px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #eee;…
An Exegetical and Rhetorical Analysis of the `συν-` Prefix in Ephesians 3:6 This exegetical study of An Exegetical and Rhetorical Analysis of the `συν-` Prefix in Ephesians 3:6 is based on a b-greek discussion from Mon Oct 29 17:05:08 2001. The initial observation arose during a study of rhetorical analysis, leading to a focus on…
An Exegetical Analysis of ἔνοχος ἐστίν in Mark 3:29 This exegetical study of ‘the sense of ενοχοσ εστιν (Mk 3:29)’ is based on a b-greek discussion from December 5, 1999. The initial query in the discussion centered on the interpretation of the Greek phrase ἔνοχος ἐστίν in Mark 3:29. The inquirer sought to understand if…
An Exegetical Analysis of the Conditional Particle εἰ as a Negative Oath in Hebrews 3:11 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 25px; } p…
Exegetical Study of Hebrews 11:3: Πίστει Νοοῦμεν Κατηρτίσθαι τοὺς Αἰῶνας This exegetical study of Hebrews 11:3: πιστει νοουμεν καθρτισθαι τουσ αιωνασ is based on a b-greek discussion from Wed Jul 1 12:08:19 1998. The initial inquiry posed several challenges regarding the interpretation of this verse, particularly for an emerging Greek student. Questions centered on the…
An Exegetical Analysis of the Relative Pronoun in 3 John 5 This exegetical study of An Exegetical Analysis of the Relative Pronoun in 3 John 5 is based on a b-greek discussion from Mon Feb 16 2004. The initial inquiry from the discussion centered on the grammatical function of the relative pronoun ὃ in 3…
“`html An Exegetical Analysis of καθὼς in Ephesians 1:4 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; color: #333; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #1a2a47; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 2em; } h3 { margin-top: 1.5em; } p { margin-bottom: 1em; } blockquote { border-left: 5px…
“`html An Exegetical Examination of John 17:3: The Granville Sharp Rule and Christological Implications body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } h2 { border-bottom: 1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 30px; } h3 { color: #555; margin-top: 20px; } p { margin-bottom: 1em;…
An Exegetical Study of Ephesians 2:1-3 This exegetical study of Ephesians 2:1-3 is based on a b-greek discussion from March 17, 2009. The initial inquiry posed questions regarding the translation of the Greek participle ὄντας in Ephesians 2:1, specifically why a seemingly present tense word is often rendered in the past. Further questions concerned the…
An Exegetical Analysis of John 3:16: The Force of οὕτως and ὥστε body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; } h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 { font-family: Georgia, serif; } blockquote { border-left: 3px solid #ccc; margin-left: 0; padding-left: 10px; font-style: italic; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px; } b.greek {…
Dear friends,
what is the effect of putting αὐτοῦ before its Referent “τὰ ἔργα”:
John 3:21 Ὁ δὲ ποιῶν τὴν ἀλήθειαν ἔρχεται πρὸς τὸ φῶς, ἵνα φανερωθῇ αὐτοῦ τὰ ἔργα, ὅτι ἐν θεῷ ἐστιν εἰργασμένα.
Is it possible to translate this Feature? Maybe “his own deeds” or something similar? Then, additionally, how can the “truth” be done? Is it rather: to act according to truth?
Thanks for all help !
Yours
Peter, Germany
Statistics: Posted by Peter Streitenberger — November 27th, 2013, 7:44 am
An Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 3:15: The Force of the Future Indicative in a Context of Eschatological Judgment This exegetical study of 1 Cor 3:15 (The force of the future indicative) is based on a b-greek discussion from April 1, 2002. The initial inquiry concerns the interpretation of Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 3:15,…
An Exegetical Study of Titus 3:5: The Washing of Regeneration and Renewal by the Holy Spirit This exegetical study of An Exegetical Study of Titus 3:5: The Washing of Regeneration and Renewal by the Holy Spirit is based on a b-greek discussion from Sun Jan 13 10:00:45 2002. The initial inquiry focuses on the…
