32 articles Mark

Mark 6:22

Mark 6:22 Richard Ghilardi qodeshlayhvh at juno.com Tue Jan 1 23:25:44 EST 2002   Septuagint Mark 6:22 Dear ers,I bow to the superior wisdom of Carl and Steven. If Carl hasn’t seenanything like it in 50 years of teaching Greek and Steven doesn’t get iteither, it must merely be a fantasy of mine. I withdraw…

Mark 6:12

Mark 6:12-13 [was ‘do participles govern whole sentence or just next main verb?’] Jonathan Ryder jpr1001 at cam.ac.uk Thu Jul 22 07:31:48 EDT 1999   do participles govern whole sentence or just next main verb? Mark 6:12-13 [was ‘do participles govern whole sentence or just next main verb?’] “Carl W. Conrad” wrote:> > Jonathan Ryder…

Mark 1:12

[] EKBALLEI: simple word in strange context (Mk 1:12)? Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu Thu Feb 20 14:35:11 EST 2003   [] RE: Why learn Greek? [] EKBALLEI: simple word in strange context (Mk 1:12)? Having begun to work on a short commentary on Mark’s gospel I’m noticing”obvious” things I’ve never paid any attention…

Mark 16:4

“anakulio”, the stone was “rolled up MK 16 4

[] MK 16:4 Stuart pinellaspt at verizon.net Mon May 2 18:26:27 EDT 2005   [] Antiquities 18.64 [] MK 16:4 Greetings;I am currently interpreting Mark 16:4, and would appreciate any insight as to a discrepancy between texts. Westscott-Hort has “anakulio”, the stone was “rolled up”, but UBS and BYZ have “apokulio”, it was “rolled away”.…

Mark 2:1

TA In Mark 2 1

TA in Mark 2:1 Richard A. Creighton richard.creighton at moore.edu.au Thu May 27 23:54:57 EDT 1999   New email list!… IXTHUS Mark 2:1 contains the phrase TA PROS THN QURAN – Zerwick/Grosvenortranslate this as “space near the door”.How is the TA functioning here?Are there other examples of the definite article being used in this kindof…

Mark 11:10

Mark 11:10

EULOGHMENOS hO ERCOMENOS EN ONOMATI KURIOU Ben Crick ben.crick at argonet.co.uk Tue Oct 19 09:24:47 EDT 1999   FW: GAR and Paratactic Connectors a good greek bible On Tue 19 Oct 1999 (02:57:20), spuluka at hotmail.com wrote:> Psalm 117:26 (118:26) is sung during the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom in > the Orthodox tradition right…

Mark 5:9

Mark 5 9 LEGION demoniak

[] Mark 5:9 Singular explained as Plural? Mitch Larramore mitchlarramore at yahoo.com Thu Dec 22 20:30:14 EST 2005   [] Mark 2:19 DUNAMAI [] Mark 5:9 Singular explained as Plural? KAI EPHRWTA AUTON, TI ONOMA SOI; KAI LEGEI AUTWiLEGIWN ONOMA MOI, hOTI POLLOI ESMEN.Is not LEGEI singular? And isn’t MOI singular? TheMOI…POLLOI at first looked…

Matthew 2:4

10054     TITLE  KJV Mt. 2 4

KJV Mt. 2:4 Ted Mann theomann at earthlink.net Mon Jun 11 17:00:44 EDT 2001 Questions about questions KJV Mt. 2:4 In Mt. 2:4, whereas the NASB, NIV, etc., translate EPUQAVETO as “he asked,”or “inquired,” I notice the KJV has “demanded,” which produces quite adifferent sense to me. Is “demanded,” a less apt translation or is…

Mark 2:16

Mark 2 16 HOI GRAMMATEIS TWN FARISAIWN

Mark 2:16 hOI GRAMMATEIS TWN FARISAIWN Jonathan Robie jonathan.robie at sagus.com Mon May 17 17:08:49 EDT 1999   Glassman Mark 2:16 hOI GRAMMATEIS TWN FARISAIWN Here’s a phrase that has thrown me for a loop. The Scribes of thePharisees? I thought they were two distinct groups.How is this to be understood?Jonathan___________________________________________________________________________Jonathan Robiejwrobie at mindspring.comLittle Greek…

Mark 16:2

Mk 16 2 Constituent Order

Mk 16:2 Constituent Order c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Tue Jun 26 14:57:36 EDT 2001   Sorry The text of Luke 2:2 and word order Anyone have anything to say about why ANATEILANTOS TOU hHLIOU shows up atthe end of the clause in Mk 16:2. Mark piles up so many adverbials in thisclause that…

Mark 16:18

Mark 16 18 AROUSIN

[] Mark 16:18 AROUSIN Carl W. Conrad cwconrad at artsci.wustl.edu Tue Feb 4 06:08:55 EST 2003 [] SE in Mark 1:24 [] Mark 16:18 AROUSIN Forwarded for Harry Jones:From: “Harry W. Jones” <hwjones2 at earthlink.net>Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:17:57 -0800Hello All,My question concerns KAI EN TAIS CERSIN OFEIS AROUSIN.I have noticed that some translations…

Mark 8:7

Ekklesia

Ekklesia Tony Calman tcalman at optusnet.com.au Sun May 9 19:10:57 EDT 1999   dia + genitive John 5:26 I have been considering the difference between a “congregation” and a “church” (if any)? The hebrew words qahal or edah seems to be translated by the word ekklesia in the LXX, which is often translated by the…

Mark 8:35

Mk 8 35 37, YUCH

Mk 8:35-37, YUCH Joe A. Friberg JoeFriberg at email.msn.com Mon Dec 20 20:36:43 EST 1999 Philippians 2:6 Philippians 2:6 Interpretations of 8.35:Paul Dixon (PD):> > << whoever desires to save his life (eternally) shall lose it> (temporally)> > and whoever loses his life temporally on account of me and the> > gospel, shall find it…

Mark 15:34

Mark 15:34

We are finally able to provide the published text of the article on the “cry of dereliction” from the Brill volume, The Language Environment of First Century Judaea, Randall Buth and R Steven Notley edd., (Brill, 2014, ISBN 9789004263406). The PDF of Randall Buth, “The Riddle of Jesus’ Cry from the Cross: the Meaning of ηλι ηλι λαμα σαβαχθανι (Matthew 27:46) and the Literary Function of ελωι ελωι λειμα σαβαχθανι (Mark 15:34)” is avaiable at:

www.biblicalLanguageCenter.com under “community” “BLC blog”

It is a fitting read/study for passion week.

Statistics: Posted by RandallButh — April 17th, 2014, 4:54 am


Mark 3:1

New Testament • Re: Two Questions about Mark 3:1-3
Wes Wood wrote:
Thanks for the responses the indirect question makes perfect sense. And the second part I don’t have a problem with either. I am meaning authorial foreshadowing inside the pericope, however. Nothing more than the author tipping his hand to what is going to happen in the narrative.

It’s a completely ordinary phrase as Timothy pointed out. It is easy to find its usage as simply “arise” in places like Mat 2:13, 9:19 26:46, Mark 10:49 14:42,. It clearly implies rising from a settled position, but nothing more. In fact, Luke 6:8 makes very clear what “εγειρε”/”εγειραι” in Mark 3:3 means.

Statistics: Posted by David Lim — June 17th, 2014, 7:18 am


Mark 9:20

New Testament • Mark 9:20 – Who’s doing what

SBL:
καὶ ἤνεγκαν αὐτὸν πρὸς αὐτόν. καὶ ἰδὼν αὐτὸν τὸ πνεῦμα εὐθὺς συνεσπάραξεν αὐτόν, καὶ πεσὼν ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ἐκυλίετο ἀφρίζων.

I can see two ways of reading this – either the boy is the one who ἰδὼν Jesus, or the spirit within him (so masc. part. is CAS).

Looking at the other participles in the verse, they clearly describe physical actions that the boy is doing (πεσὼν … ἀφρίζων), so my initial instinct is to read ἰδὼν as referring to the boy, and not the spirit. Would then account for the mention of τὸ πνεῦμα as giving a separate subject for the action of the verb συνεσπάραξεν.

A third option would be to not think of the two as separate entities, and so it’s not a case of “either/or” but “both”, as they’re rather intertwined at this moment.

I see a similar thing in Mark 9:26 – καὶ κράξας καὶ πολλὰ σπαράξας ἐξῆλθεν – the participles describe the physical actions of the boy, and the verb is the action that the spirit does (‘And after crying out and convulsing violently, it departed’).

Thoughts?

Statistics: Posted by S Walch — February 18th, 2017, 8:30 pm