41 articles Revelation

Revelation 1:10

Rev. 1 10

An Exegetical Analysis of **ἐν τῇ κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ** in Revelation 1:10 This exegetical study of The Meaning of **ἐν τῇ κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ** in Revelation 1:10 is based on a b-greek discussion from December 1, 2003. The initial discussion highlighted that the prevalent interpretation of “Lord’s day” in Revelation 1:10 as Sunday relies not on internal…

Revelation 3:16

Rev 3 16 EMEW

This exegetical study of Rev 3:16 εμεω is based on a b-greek discussion from July 29, 2008. The initial query focused on the precise translation of the verb ἐμέω (specifically the aorist infinitive ἐμέσαι) in Revelation 3:16, particularly questioning whether a highly colloquial or vulgar rendering, such as “to puke,” is an accurate or appropriate…

Revelation 4:11

Rev 4.11 (breaking Of Sharp’s Rule)

Rev 4.11 (breaking of Sharp’s Rule) Dave Washburn dwashbur at nyx.net Thu Jun 21 05:28:59 εδτ 2001   Rev 4.9 (Double Accentuation) Rev 4.11 (breaking of Sharp’s Rule) > Revelation 4.11> αχιοσ ει, hO κυριοσ και hO θεοσ hHMWN,> λαβειν θν δοχαν και θν τιμην και θν δυναμιν,> hOTI συ εκτισασ τα παντα> και δια…

Revelation 2:10

New Testament • Re: Rev 2:10
Stephen Carlson wrote:
Per BDAG μηδείς 2bβ (p. 647), μηδέν = in no way

Ah I see. That makes perfect sense, though I don’t have BDAG. ;)

Stephen Hughes wrote:

Stephen Carlson wrote:Per BDAG μηδείς 2bβ (p. 647), μηδέν = in no way

It seems weaker than examples like:

Luke 4:35 wrote:
Καὶ ἐπετίμησεν αὐτῷ ὁ Ἰησοῦς, λέγων, Φιμώθητι, καὶ ἔξελθε ἐξ αὐτοῦ. Καὶ ῥίψαν αὐτὸν τὸ δαιμόνιον εἰς μέσον ἐξῆλθεν ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ, μηδὲν βλάψαν αὐτόν.

Acts 16:28 wrote:
Ἐφώνησεν δὲ φωνῇ μεγάλῃ ὁ Παῦλος λέγων, Μηδὲν πράξῃς σεαυτῷ κακόν· ἅπαντες γάρ ἐσμεν ἐνθάδε.

Thanks for the examples!

Stephen Hughes wrote:
Compare this instance, though, where οὐ is used different to οὐδέν

Mark 14:60 wrote:Καὶ ἀναστὰς ὁ ἀρχιερεὺς εἰς μέσον ἐπηρώτησεν τὸν Ἰησοῦν, λέγων, Οὐκ ἀποκρίνῃ οὐδέν; Τί οὗτοί σου καταμαρτυροῦσιν;

Isn’t this just the double negative, where “ουκ αποκρινη ουδεν” just means “do you not answer anything?”

Statistics: Posted by David Lim — June 25th, 2014, 6:26 am


Revelation 1:18

“`html An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 1:18: The Significance of ἐγενόμην νεκρός body { font-family: sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; } h2, h3 { color: #333; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } ul { list-style-type: disc; margin-left: 20px; }…

Revelation 22:15

Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 22:15 body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, Palatino, ‘Book Antiqua’, Georgia, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; max-width: 900px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; } h1, h2, h3 { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, Palatino, ‘Book Antiqua’, Georgia, serif; margin-top: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; } h2 { font-size: 1.8em; color: #2C3E50; border-bottom: 1px solid #CCC; padding-bottom: 0.2em;…

Revelation 16:10

An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 16:10: The Significance of `ἐμασῶντο τὰς γλώσσας` Revelation 16:10, situated within the catastrophic sequence of the bowl judgments, presents a vivid and somewhat enigmatic description of the unrepentant’s suffering. Specifically, the phrase `ἐμασῶντο τὰς γλώσσας αὐτῶν ἐκ τοῦ πόνου` (they gnawed their tongues because of the pain) raises exegetical questions…

Revelation 11:3

An Exegetical Study of Revelation 11:3: An Analysis of Verb Tense and Implied Direct Object Revelation 11:3 presents several interpretive challenges for exegetes, primarily concerning the grammatical function of its principal verbs and the identification of the implied direct object. Initial inquiries frequently focus on the precise temporal nuance conveyed by the verbs and how…

Revelation 3:1

An Exegetical Analysis of τὰ ἑπτὰ πνεύματα τοῦ θεοῦ in Revelation 3:1 The phrase τὰ ἑπτὰ πνεύματα τοῦ θεοῦ in Revelation 3:1 presents a significant exegetical challenge, primarily concerning its translation and theological interpretation. While a literal rendering as “the seven spirits of God” directly reflects the Greek grammatical structure, various English translations often provide…

Revelation 4:3

An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 4:3: The Grammatical Function of Dative Nouns in Describing Divine Appearance The present exegetical study addresses a grammatical and semantic question arising from Revelation 4:3, specifically concerning the precise function of the dative nouns ἰάσπιδι (iaspidi) and σαρδίῳ (sardiō) in relation to λίθῳ (lithō) and ὁράσει (horasei). The primary issue…

Revelation 7:4

Revelation 7:4 and Israel

“`html An Exegetical Study of Revelation 7:4 This exegetical study of Revelation 7:4 is based on a b-greek discussion from April 2, 2007. The initial inquiry centered on the precise semantic range of the phrase ἐκ πάσης φυλῆς υἱῶν Ἰσραήλ, specifically questioning whether it denotes that the 144,000 sealed individuals constitute the entirety of Israel…

Revelation 12:18

Revelation 12:18

An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 12:18: Textual Placement and Verbal Agreement This exegetical study of Revelation 12:18 is based on a b-greek discussion from Fri Jul 30 14:57:17 1999. The initial inquiry concerns the variation in English Bible translations regarding the verse numbering of Revelation 12, specifically why some versions conclude the chapter with 18…

Revelation 4:9

Rev 4.9 (Double Accentuation)

An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 4:9: Textual Variants and Accentuation Issues This exegetical study of Rev 4.9 (Double Accentuation) is based on a b-greek discussion from Thu Jun 21 03:02:55 EDT 2001. The initial inquiry concerns an apparent double accent on the word θρόνῳ (dative singular of θρόνος) in Revelation 4:9 as observed in a…

Revelation 20:3

Revelation 20:3

An Exegetical Analysis of ἄχρι τελεσθῇ τὰ χίλια ἔτη in Revelation 20:3 body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 800px; margin: auto; padding: 20px; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding:…

Revelation 11:15

Revelation 11:15

“`html Textual Variants in Revelation 11:15 and 22:19: The Influence of the Latin Vulgate on the Textus Receptus body { font-family: ‘Palatino Linotype’, ‘Book Antiqua’, Palatino, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 20px; } h2, h3 { color: #2C3E50; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #BDC3C7; margin: 1.5em 10px; padding: 0.5em 10px; font-style: italic; } b {…

Revelation 3:12

Revelation 3:12

“`html The Pendent Nominative in Revelation 3:12: A Grammatical and Textual Analysis body { font-family: ‘Times New Roman’, serif; line-height: 1.6; margin: 2em; } h1, h2, h3 { color: #333; } b { font-weight: bold; } i { font-style: italic; } blockquote { border-left: 5px solid #ccc; margin: 1.5em 0; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #f9f9f9;…

Revelation 4:8

An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 4:8: The Grammatical Status of ΚΥΡΙΟΣ Ὁ ΘΕΟΣ Ὁ ΠΑΝΤΟΚΡΑΤΩΡ An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 4:8: The Grammatical Status of ΚΥΡΙΟΣ Ὁ ΘΕΟΣ Ὁ ΠΑΝΤΟΚΡΑΤΩΡ This exegetical study of An Exegetical Examination of Revelation 4:8: The Grammatical Status of ΚΥΡΙΟΣ Ὁ ΘΕΟΣ Ὁ ΠΑΝΤΟΚΡΑΤΩΡ is based on a b-greek discussion…

Revelation 17:7

The Use Of The Greek Participle In Rev 17 7

The Use of the Greek Participle in Revelation 17:7 This exegetical study of The Use of the Greek Participle in Revelation 17:7 is based on a b-greek discussion from July 21, 2010. The initial inquiry concerns the grammatical and semantic implications of the Greek participle βαστάζοντος in Revelation 17:7, specifically whether its use emphasizes a…

Revelation 9:14

Rev. 9 14

An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 9:14 An Exegetical Analysis of Revelation 9:14: The Grammatical Scope of the Prepositional Phrase Revelation 9:14 presents a concise but grammatically significant passage that invites exegetical scrutiny, particularly regarding the syntactic function of the prepositional phrase ἐπὶ τῷ ποταμῷ τῷ μεγάλῳ Εὐφράτῃ (epi tō potamō tō megalō Euphratē). The primary…