22 articles Ephesians

Ephesians 3:6

Togetherness in Eph 3:6 c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Mon Oct 29 17:05:08 EST 2001   Towards a semantic definition of Greek Middle Theological Dictionary of the New Testament Before I started looking over Ephesians today, I was reading a book onRhetorical Analysis* and for that reason I was perhaps looking for patternsof interest…

Ephesians 4:18

ONTES Eph 4:18 – which participle? c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Wed Oct 3 15:17:32 EDT 2001   Eph 4:19 Vice List What To Do With PNEUMATIKOS A disagreement exists about which participle ONTES should be joined with inEph 4:18. ESKOTWMENOI – H.A.W. Meyer, E. Best, H. Alford, P.T. Obrien, UBSGNT3APHLLOTRIWMENOI – Eadie, and…

Ephesians 4:22

Eph 4: 22-24 Dale M. Wheeler dalemw at teleport.com Wed Apr 5 17:49:12 EDT 2000   Previous message: Mk. 12:34b Next message: Thinking Like a Scribe Mk 6:46 Harold R. Holmyard III wrote:Dear Dale, You bring out an >important emphasis in stressing the relevance of Eph 2:15 to Eph 4:22-24. I >recently studied Colossians with…

Ephesians 4:9

Eph 4:19 Vice List c stirling bartholomew cc.constantine at worldnet.att.net Wed Oct 3 13:48:30 EDT 2001   results of May 1 want ad for volunteers ONTES Eph 4:18 – which participle? Eph 4:19 hOITINES APHLGHKOTES hAUTOUS PAREDWKAN THi ASELEGIAiEIS ERGASIAN AKAQARSIAS PAHS EN PLEONEXIAi.There is a temptation to find a semantic link here between ERGASIAN…

Ephesians 2:3

Fwd  Ephesians 2 1 3

[] Fwd: Ephesians 2:1-3 John Butzu jbutzu at gmail.com Tue Mar 24 10:48:13 EDT 2009   [] Zhubert’s daily greek read [] Fwd: Ephesians 2:1-3 ———- Forwarded message ———-From: John Butzu <jbutzu at gmail.com>Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:01 AMSubject: Ephesians 2:1-3To: at lists.ibiblio.orgHello. Could someone please explain to me why in Ephesians 2:1…

Ephesians 3:16

New Testament • Ephesians 3:16-17

Paul uses many parenthetical statements, especially in Ephesians. How does one determine when a parenthesis begins and ends? Also, regarding Eph.3:16-17, does it not seem that ινα δωη υμιν κατα τον πλουτον της δοξης αυτου δυναμει κραταιωθηναι δια του πνευματος αυτου εις τον εσω ανθρωπον kατοικησαι τον χριστον δια της πιστεως εν ταις καρδιαις υμων is a parenthetical within a parenthetical? Thanks.

Statistics: Posted by dpost1254 — March 15th, 2017, 4:16 pm

Ephesians 2:12

New Testament • Re: Ephesians 2:12

Mr. Conrad,

I tend to agree with you.

Added to that is that Paul calls what is happening a “mystery.” The 10 Northern Tribes being brought back into the “fold” (2 sticks becoming one, Ezekiel 37) would not have been a mystery since their Scriptures clearly expressed what would happen.

Thank you for the response. I appreciate it.

Dustin Curlee

Statistics: Posted by dcurlee — December 21st, 2013, 5:17 pm

Ephesians 5:5

Ephesians 5:5

Jonathan Robie » October 13th, 2013, 7:54 am Ephesians 5:5 wrote:τοῦτο γὰρ ⸀ἴστε γινώσκοντες ὅτι πᾶς πόρνος ἢ ἀκάθαρτος ἢ πλεονέκτης, ⸀ὅ ἐστιν εἰδωλολάτρης, οὐκ ἔχει κληρονομίαν ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ τοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ θεοῦ. This is an unusual phrase, isn’t it? ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ τοῦ θεοῦ would not have surprised me, the Kingdom of God is a…

Ephesians 2.6

Ephesians 2:6

Ephesians 2.6, SUNEK’AQISEN >EN TO’IS … etc. inflection of the first aorist, 3 p singular, SUNEKAQISEN, whence the final nu? Inflections in Smyth, #383, p. 115, ELUSA, ELUSAS, ELUSE, with no final nu; but methinks I’ve seen that final nu often, don’t know where. Is there a rule? It’s a handy nu, with a vowel…

Ephesians 3:4

Ephesians 3:4

Ephesians 3:3-4 “[ὅτι] κατὰ ἀποκάλυψιν ἐγνωρίσθη μοι τὸ μυστήριον, καθὼς προέγραψα ἐν ὀλίγῳ, πρὸς ὃ δύνασθε ἀναγινώσκοντες νοῆσαι τὴν σύνεσίν μου ἐν τῷ μυστηρίῳ τοῦ Χριστοῦ” “OTI KATA APOKALUYIV EGNWRISQH MOI TO MUSTHRIOV, KAQWS TROEGRAYA EV OLIGW, PROS O DUVASQE ANAGIVWSKONTES VOHSAI THN SUNESIV MOU EN TW MUSTHRIW TOU CRISTOU” (sorry if the transliteration is…

Ephesians 4:11

Ephesians 4:11

[] syntatical significance of Eph. 4:11 Clay Lin lin_clay at hotmail.com Tue May 6 15:10:00 EDT 2003   [] Greek trivia: all the letters… [] Greek trivia: all the letters… Greetings,I’m wondering of the significance of the syntax of Eph. 4:11 (MEN… DE… DE…DE… KAI).The significance lies, of course, in whether the last two elements…

Ephesians 2:14

Ephesians 2:14

Ephesians 2:14-15 … ὁ ποιήσας τὰ ἀμφότερα ἓν καὶ τὸ μεσότοιχον τοῦ φραγμοῦ λύσας, τὴν ἔχθραν ἐν τῇ σαρκὶ αὐτοῦ τὸν νόμον τῶν ἐντολῶν ἐν δόγμασιν καταργήσας…. I have come across two different translations of this passage, one in the ESV which says, “….who has made us both one and has broken down in his…

Ephesians 3:1

Ephesians 3.1

Ephesians 3.1 Al Lukaszewski alski at fuller.edu Tue May 4 00:25:00 EDT 1999   FWIW: Relatively easy classical Greek texts Help with PhD Dissertation Pre-topic Dear Listmembers:I would be interested in hearing what everyone thinks of the syntax, inEphesians 3.1, of TOUTOU XARIN and whether the sentence should beunderstood as with an understood EIMI or…

Ephesians 2:8

Ephesians 2:8

Ephesians 2:8,9 Matthew R. Miller biblicalscribe at hotmail.com Wed Jun 6 14:29:48 EDT 2001   Phil 2:2, why TO AUTO accusative? Is Mk 14:62 a implied threat Hello all,th xariti in Ephesians 2:8 is in the dative case (feminine singular). Iunderstand the dative case to have the following main functions in koineGreek: 1) to indicate…

Ephesians 3:18

Ephesians 3:18-19

Ephesians 3:18-19 hINA EXISCUSHTE KATALABESQAI SUN PASIN TOIS hAGIOIS TI … GNWNAI TE THN … AGAPHN TOU CRISTOU In my recent attempts to penetrate the logical flow of Ephesians 3:14-19, I’ve posed the following question: Does EXISCUSHTE govern both of the following infinitives (KATALABESQAI and GNWNAI); or does the TE following GNWNAI indicate the beginning…